Consolidated White Mage 4.0 Feedback Thread

[javid]

You left out a very important factor. Using https://www.fflogs.com/reports/zXbgN...aling&source=8

3 Medica healed 104.8k which is 24933 per GCD used.
4 Regen healed 97.5k which is 24375 per GCD used.
6 CureII healed 73.3k which is 12216 per GCD used.
6 CureI healed 38k which is 6333 per GCD used.

CureI is 1/4 as efficient as Medica/Regen and CureII is 1/2 as efficient as Medica/Regen.

Addendum:
3 Medica casts cost 3711 mana which is 28 hp per 1 mana.
4 Regen casts cost 2472 mana which is 39 hp per 1 mana.
6 CureII casts cost 5304 mana which is 14 hp per 1 mana.
6 CureI casts cost 2652 mana which is 14 hp per 1 mana.

Conclusion: Time efficiency: Medica/Regen/CureII/CureI and Mana efficiency: Regen/Medica/CureII/CureI

your post didn't address any of the questions I supposed.

How did what you say demonstrate a different result in which skills are most frequented??
How did what you say demonstrate a different result in which skills most efficient in their function? ( Of course a a medica II will net more potency/gcd*mp than a cure...b/c they have two different functions! But of the different functions & capabilities which is doing their respective function optimally (where the word optimal refers to the skill's max potential potency?)
How did what you say a demonstrate a different result in which skills were most in excess at their function & capability (effective potency/max potency)?

The Post wasn't attempting to suggest an alternative way of healing the fight more efficiently, nor changing the functionality of each skill (regen, meds, cures, etc). The Post was simply to show, given the specific functions that each of our healing spells accomplishes the ones MOST FREQUENCTLY used, and the ones most used to its own full potential & functions, were (and are) Cure I and Cure II!

So clearly you and all the ppl up voting didnt understand, the stats and interpretation I made of them are valid.... It's not a matter of opinion.