#FFXIVHEALERSTRIKE

[flowerkatie]

Since you are someone who is by their own confession, new to the forums, once again- this thread is about healer job designs- not derailing threads over attacking other posters . So if you're going to use judgemental language like "complete nonsense" and "terrible" , which allude principally to discussions in the healer forum over several years - at least try to back them up, because I know I have over the years, whereas I haven't seen you do so.

So if you can't find them they're in https://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/...9-Healer-Roles Enjoy

Feeling personally attacked because someone believes your view-point is nonsense is entirely a you issue, you tried to invalidate the comments of a poster and when called out for doing so and that posters original point defended by myself — its somehow an attack. Despite the fact I'm simply responding to points raised. Most of the proposed suggestions are terrible and you did not reference any of these in your original response to Striker nor any response following, neither is anybody going to dig through your previous posts to find those despite that being something you like doing.

You made a nonsensical point, that was pointed out and you responded to them by saying their post was "trying to score cheap points", you got criticism on the fact that their response was valid and then you say that response is "garbled and jumbled, misquoted trainwreck" and then proceed to make statements like "So if you're going to use judgemental language like [...]". The epitome of the fact that experience makes the suggestions no more valid than it proves that person to be any good at the role they're suggesting to improve.

The problem with your line of thinking is the fact that a lot of people in a similar vein to striker are always saying “don’t complain offer solutions” then when solutions are also offered they are randomly deemed not good enough

Yet, there have been solutions I've agreed with as well as complaints. It doesn't mean the majority of them aren't terrible.

[IDontPetLalas]

Feeling personally attacked because someone believes your view-point is nonsense is entirely a you issue, you tried to invalidate the comments of a poster and when called out for doing so and that posters original point defended by myself — its somehow an attack. Despite the fact I'm simply responding to points raised. Most of the proposed suggestions are terrible and you did not reference any of these in your original response to Striker nor any response following, neither is anybody going to dig through your previous posts to find those despite that being something you like doing.

You made a nonsensical point, that was pointed out and you responded to them by saying their post was "trying to score cheap points", you got criticism on the fact that their response was valid and then you say that response is "garbled and jumbled, misquoted trainwreck" and then proceed to make statements like "So if you're going to use judgemental language like [...]". The epitome of the fact that experience makes the suggestions no more valid than it proves that person to be any good at the role they're suggesting to improve.


Yet, there have been solutions I've agreed with as well as complaints. It doesn't mean the majority of them aren't terrible.

So, let's get this straight, since, as I said, you're quite new to the forums, and I haven't seen what your viewpoint is to date - which previous suggestions did you consider to be terrible? Since that is aligned with the general subject of this thread. Can you state that clearly?