#FFXIVHEALERSTRIKE

[LibitIncarne]

Is it possible for you to share the thread ? I' m curious to see what they're finding difficult lol.

Wuk has the lowest sustain of every single "roleplay" solo instance because they decided to give her an unbuffed Thrill of Battle instead of Equilibrium or Bloodwhetting. Every other solo instance (not including the Alphinaud and Urianger ones because they are literally healers) is a Black Mage with Cure II, a Red Mage with a buffed Vercure, a Samurai with a buffed Second Wind and a healer NPC as backup, or you have a restoration potion on a relatively short cooldown that fully restores your health.

[flowerkatie]

Surely there's a better way to state these thoughts than throwing stones in a glass house...

If you serve something out be prepared for it to be dished back to you, call it a glass house but it makes the points no less valid.

[BunnyQueen]

IDK why they are complaining that content is too hard, these dungeons were easy. The normal trials, easy. EX Vali, Fun. Noone cares about Jalool Ja. What's crazy is people think we are asking for stuff to be harder, NO we are asking for healers to heal more often and to have 1 or 2 more damage buttons. That is all, not asking for harder. Somehow kids who can't rub 2 cells together equate more healing needed to harder. No. Stop. Think.

[IDontPetLalas]

I love that instead of responding to any points raised you instead once again tried to sound smart, spoke nonsense and quoted what is obviously a meme because you genuinely think it makes your point stronger. Somehow Striker44 is the one with failed contributions.

You seem to have a complex where you think belittling statements of those with valid criticism of your complete nonsense is making you sound smart.

Since you are someone who is by their own confession, new to the forums, once again- this thread is about healer job designs- not derailing threads over attacking other posters . So if you're going to use judgemental language like "complete nonsense" and "terrible" , which allude principally to discussions in the healer forum over several years - at least try to back them up, because I know I have over the years, whereas I haven't seen you do so.

So if you can't find them they're in https://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/...9-Healer-Roles Enjoy

[Supersnow845]

You made a post that is universally known and requires zero effort on the fact many healers have made 'detailed' and 'extensive' suggestions and Striker44 (correctly) points out the obvious that many of these suggestions are terrible and experience in the role is not synonymous with valid suggestions and now you're saying his post has no meaningful contribution.

Pointing out nonsense is a valid contribution.

The problem with your line of thinking is the fact that a lot of people in a similar vein to striker are always saying “don’t complain offer solutions” then when solutions are also offered they are randomly deemed not good enough

Like what do people actually want

[flowerkatie]

Since you are someone who is by their own confession, new to the forums, once again- this thread is about healer job designs- not derailing threads over attacking other posters . So if you're going to use judgemental language like "complete nonsense" and "terrible" , which allude principally to discussions in the healer forum over several years - at least try to back them up, because I know I have over the years, whereas I haven't seen you do so.

So if you can't find them they're in https://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/...9-Healer-Roles Enjoy

Feeling personally attacked because someone believes your view-point is nonsense is entirely a you issue, you tried to invalidate the comments of a poster and when called out for doing so and that posters original point defended by myself — its somehow an attack. Despite the fact I'm simply responding to points raised. Most of the proposed suggestions are terrible and you did not reference any of these in your original response to Striker nor any response following, neither is anybody going to dig through your previous posts to find those despite that being something you like doing.

You made a nonsensical point, that was pointed out and you responded to them by saying their post was "trying to score cheap points", you got criticism on the fact that their response was valid and then you say that response is "garbled and jumbled, misquoted trainwreck" and then proceed to make statements like "So if you're going to use judgemental language like [...]". The epitome of the fact that experience makes the suggestions no more valid than it proves that person to be any good at the role they're suggesting to improve.

The problem with your line of thinking is the fact that a lot of people in a similar vein to striker are always saying “don’t complain offer solutions” then when solutions are also offered they are randomly deemed not good enough

Yet, there have been solutions I've agreed with as well as complaints. It doesn't mean the majority of them aren't terrible.

[IDontPetLalas]

Feeling personally attacked because someone believes your view-point is nonsense is entirely a you issue, you tried to invalidate the comments of a poster and when called out for doing so and that posters original point defended by myself — its somehow an attack. Despite the fact I'm simply responding to points raised. Most of the proposed suggestions are terrible and you did not reference any of these in your original response to Striker nor any response following, neither is anybody going to dig through your previous posts to find those despite that being something you like doing.

You made a nonsensical point, that was pointed out and you responded to them by saying their post was "trying to score cheap points", you got criticism on the fact that their response was valid and then you say that response is "garbled and jumbled, misquoted trainwreck" and then proceed to make statements like "So if you're going to use judgemental language like [...]". The epitome of the fact that experience makes the suggestions no more valid than it proves that person to be any good at the role they're suggesting to improve.


Yet, there have been solutions I've agreed with as well as complaints. It doesn't mean the majority of them aren't terrible.

So, let's get this straight, since, as I said, you're quite new to the forums, and I haven't seen what your viewpoint is to date - which previous suggestions did you consider to be terrible? Since that is aligned with the general subject of this thread. Can you state that clearly?

[flowerkatie]

So, let's get this straight, since, as I said, you're quite new to the forums, and I haven't seen what your viewpoint is to date - which previous suggestions did you consider to be terrible? Since that is aligned with the general subject of this thread. Can you state that clearly?

Square has been provided with extensive and detailed suggestions from not one, but multiple healers with years of experience.

You started this conversation referring to "extensive" and "detailed" suggestions and in that response and every response since, you've not provided a single link or said which suggestions you consider to be "extensive".

A large majority of these suggestions believe that part of the issue in healers is that their Damage rotation is not engaging, they believe that because most of our time is spent doing damage it should be engaging to do so. Yet, these same individuals admit that damage is a "filler" to healing. The real issue is that healing is simply oversaturated, in easy content the damage does not justify the healing we have and in difficult content we're given two healers where one could suffice meaning that almost all healers who are worth their salt will be spending all GCD on damage and oGCD on healing. The solution isn't to continue spending all GCD's on damage but in a more engaging way, it is to actually make healing required.

Now, please — I doubt your next response will reference any of these 'detailed' and 'extensive' suggestions but I hope you prove me wrong and actually give us something to discuss.

[Supersnow845]

You started this conversation referring to "extensive" and "detailed" suggestions and in that response and every response since, you've not provided a single link or said which suggestions you consider to be "extensive".

A large majority of these suggestions believe that part of the issue in healers is that their Damage rotation is not engaging, they believe that because most of our time is spent doing damage it should be engaging to do so. Yet, these same individuals admit that damage is a "filler" to healing. The real issue is that healing is simply oversaturated, in easy content the damage does not justify the healing we have and in difficult content we're given two healers where one could suffice meaning that almost all healers who are worth their salt will be spending all GCD on damage and oGCD on healing. The solution isn't to continue spending all GCD's on damage but in a more engaging way, it is to actually make healing required.

Now, please — I doubt your next response will reference any of these 'detailed' and 'extensive' suggestions but I hope you prove me wrong and actually give us something to discuss.

I mean you are unhappy with responses because you have unilaterally decided what’s important to fix healers and then haven’t factored in the fact we’ve done this song and dance before

You say “the problem isn’t the damage rotation it’s the fact we need to heal in a more engaging way” but there is plenty of people who won’t support any change that forces greater reliance on the healer, it’s why a lot of people ask for better damage rotation

[flowerkatie]

I mean you are unhappy with responses because you have unilaterally decided what’s important to fix healers and then haven’t factored in the fact we’ve done this song and dance before

You say “the problem isn’t the damage rotation it’s the fact we need to heal in a more engaging way” but there is plenty of people who won’t support any change that forces greater reliance on the healer, it’s why a lot of people ask for better damage rotation

Wrong assumptions, I've already had two people respond to me the argument something similar to "We've tried to ask for what you want, but they told us to do Ultimate's, so now we're asking for this". So yes, I have factored in that this discussion has been going on for a long while, I have also not decided what is important to fix. I simply disagree with some of the fixes proposed. I don't see your point.

Edit: Not only that, the whole point of "but there is plenty of people who won’t support any change that forces greater reliance on the healer, it’s why a lot of people ask for better damage rotation" is just confusing to me, there are also plenty of people who wont support the change of a better damage rotation. There are a lot of individuals who think that healers shouldn't even have to do damage. So you're just bouncing from one point that is mixed to another that is (maybe slightly?) less mixed but still mixed.