Good to see this thread is still on the front page. The devs deserve all the praise they get.
Good to see this thread is still on the front page. The devs deserve all the praise they get.




Yeah except this thread is not praising the devs, it’s farming an even more useless set of internet points than reddit karma on the back of the drama caused by poor balancing that the devs themselves caused
I’ll praise the devs when they actually do something worth praising for a change which I haven’t seen much of since 4.x




Well, there's the usual sad group of permanently negative trolls who can't stand the thought of people actually being happy, but in general it's nice to see that even in this cesspool of negativity, the game is so popular that positive posts still appear. Personally, I've loved my time in FFXIV, and both ShB and EW hit it out of the park for me. The devs deserve all the praise I can give them. But hey, people love to point out how that 600-something page thread "must" mean people hate the game, even though a large swath of it is people disagreeing with the OP and celebrating this xpac, so why shouldn't the same logic apply to the ever-increasing length of this thread and its continued presence on the front page, eh?![]()
Bait.
You know darn well that isn't what's being touted around, get over yourself. The thread's already made it clear: people like the devs, they just want some faults being owned and tackled, nothing more. And constantly denouncing people who point those out as "haters" won't help the game in any way. You like the game? Great. You want to praise the development team? Great, a lot of people do online already! What, you think the forums are too negative and would like to change it? Well good for you, I made a thread just for that, how about that, go out there and contribute! But don't be pedantic by calling everyone who said anything as "omg too negative, haters waah". And I bet, if anyone answers you, the only thing you'll say is "see? You're against what I say, you must be a hater!". Except, no. You're being called out on literally being on the polar opposite of what you claim to dislike about this thread. You aren't being any different.
Just let the thread die otherwise if you don't care. This thread only has drama bait, there's no need for you to do the same. If you really want to put actions to your words, say something nice in the proper platforms.
Last edited by Midareyukki; 09-24-2022 at 11:24 AM.
But arent the devs already constantly apologizing for their mess ups? Who'se saying that they're arent? Are they just blind or havent actually paid attention to the communication the team has been giving us? We had two quick posts within the same patch cycle twice about the savage and job balancing back to back. Its just unfortunately stuff that for a good portion of players didnt want to hear or feel like its still not enough so they're being angry about it.
Currently we're getting a live letter in the upcoming week where they'll be talking and reviewing a lot of the feedback from 6.2 and onward. My issue is the huge amounts of disingenuous people among the community and honestly its sometimes kinda hard to ignore when they're doing a swell job of being the loudest group within the pile of feedback the forums has.
...okay and?
They apologize for their "mistakes". Sure. And what about the actions they take after their apology? I'm not talking about the times Yoshida said "We apologize for what happened". I'm talking about what they did after. Not everything ended up fine, some stuff are still only band-aided. Besides, as good as the devs are, it doesn't exempt them from being called out on those aspects. Otherwise they wouldn't apologize at all. Maybe you wouldn't have those posts back to back if the dev team had listened to its playerbase. Rather than telling healers to "go play Ultimate".
I mean, Atelier, I told you not even a day ago: It doesn't matter if "other companies" do it worse, if there are stuff that are needed to be pointed out for there to be any improvement, even if we're doing better than others, why wouldn't we? It doesn't exempt them from criticism. What it does is earn them respect and consideration, but it also needs to be reciprocal. If they don't award their fans with respect, why would anyone give them in turn? And some stuff haven't been apologized for in a proper and responsible way. That had nothing to do with "whiners", you really need to let that argument go. Because it always seems that's your only answer to things, when you know by now that the way people end up is either that they learn to respect the devs, or people just turn against them on the spot. It had to do with the way they approached the subject, and then the subsequent reaction. Even if they're better than other devs, they can still trip up, right? Even monkeys fall from trees. And they can take it when we say "yo, you tripped here", right? To me, that's not being disrespectful, that's doing what the devs asked for: they wanted fans to give feedback, even if it meant it was negative. So that the game improves. Or, what, should we only give them positive feedback from here on and never address problems that arise?
I never said "we wanted an apology". I said we wanted them to own the stuff that didn't work that well, and actively improve them. "I'm sorry" rings hollow when the action you take is weak. YES there are reasons, but there are also reasons for people to question the weight of the measures taken. Plus, just because you're tired of all the negativity, you shouldn't deny that some things have been addressed rather weakly and could be better addressed in the future. And again, I wasn't even talking about the whiners, because odds are Square won't care for them. We all know those guys are the worst part. I'm talking about people who aren't going to that extreme and are still called haters for doing so.
Anyway. Yeah, they're going to have a Live Letter soon, and they will be parsing the threads for feedback, but this thread doesn't have any. If anything, the only thing that can be construed from this is that some fans want them to be more transparent. But that's beyond Yoshida's abilities, and if the upper guys don't want that, we won't have any, period. Everything else can be dismissed.
again you keep misconstruing my actual arguments, were in my posts did I ever say "only positive criticism"? in fact thats an oxymoron in itself, there's no such thing as "positive" criticism. There's however constructive and valid criticism, and Ive done my fair share of expressing it in some of this game's areas. You and many people here keep acting as if I want everyone to speak no evil, see no evil, hear no evil or some such nonsense when that sort of mentality is nonsensical in of itself. I want this game to improve, this game isnt perfect. But I also want for people to chill out with a lot of their takes where they start acting all disingenuous over the game and my issue is that doesnt help the game to grow, that kind of attitude just doesnt solve anything at all.


Entry No. 1 in the hater playbook: everything you disagree with is bait posted by a troll.
Entry No. 2: trans-Internet mind reading, knowing what the person you disagree with really thinks.
Entry No. 3: grand generalizations about "people," because what you alone want isn't rhetorically powerful enough.
Entry No. 4: denouncing labeling of people when people you disagree with do it (e.g., "haters"), but being just fine with it when it's applied to those people you disagree with (e.g., "simps," "shills," "boot-lickers," "perfect consumer," and so on.)
Entry No. 5: telling people to give you the last word on the subject.
Later, regarding their post:
That's an admission of intentional trolling by Midareyukki, there, folks.
Not that it wasn't obvious.
Last edited by Silverbane; 09-24-2022 at 12:14 PM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|