#FFXIVHEALERSTRIKE

[AmiableApkallu]

Your average DF run will require healing, maybe even a lot, and some rez as well.

I recently completed an admittedly idiosyncratic thing where I took SCH through every piece of instanced content normally done via DF (on Crystal, if anyone thinks that makes a difference).

It was quite depressing to see how often Eos + (Recitation_if_available_)Excogitation was sufficient to sustain the tank through wall-to-wall pulls. Sprinkle in some random Lustrates, Protractions, and fairy abilities, and I'd argue that ye olde DF tank doesn't actually need that much assistance from the healer to handle "real" trash pulls.

It was also quite depressing to see how often my existence in the party is to raise the other party members or else concoct some amazing combination of mitigations and shields so that they could face-tank a mechanic with 392 vuln stacks.

[Hyperia]

The core problem I see is that the devs have a tank dev and DPS devs but no healer dev. The dev responsible for healers happens to be the caster dev and that is why DPS comes up so much as that is what they are familiar with.

Until we get a dedicated healer dev, we will always be in this situation and even then, the healer dev must be strong and willing to stand their ground to get things for healers fixed properly by addressing excessive self-healing and mitigation.

[GrimGale]

That's the thing though. I do think it's great. If you think it's "morsels" then I encourage you to go clear the savage tier too and come back with your opinion on how it went also.

Welp this is my third clear of M4S


You lied to me.

[Aravell]

I still don't get why it's so difficult for people to understand that higher healing requirements doesn't preclude a better damage kit and vice versa. Why do people always have to come in and say "No, I want A! I don't want B!" when A and B can coexist just fine (and did coexist just fine in Stormblood).

I don't know about everyone else, but I personally find 'Cure x 9 > Medica > Repeat' as boring as 'Glare x 11 > Dia > Repeat'.

[Shurrikhan]

I still don't get why it's so difficult for people to understand that higher healing requirements doesn't preclude a better damage kit and vice versa. Why do people always have to come in and say "No, I want A! I don't want B!" when A and B can coexist just fine (and did coexist just fine in Stormblood).

I don't know about everyone else, but I personally find 'Cure x 9 > Medica > Repeat' as boring as 'Glare x 11 > Dia > Repeat'.

It is. I mean, it's just the equivalent of filler attack, banked-damage attack, filler AoE, and banked-damage AoE. They're no more interesting than any other variety of otherwise dull actions. Mixed up, they're maybe okay; imbalanced (spamming just Medica between Medica IIs for 8-man content or Cure IIs between Regens for 4-man content -- if AoEs were ever nerfed enough not to be the spam for everything), they're boring.

But at least if we had to use both healing and attack GCDs frequently, that variety could be doubled. Mix in priority conflicts within time constraints, moreover, and those individually dull actions get some decent optimization depth in context.

[Mortex]

Welp this is my third clear of M4S


You lied to me.

Watch them come around and say you are an elitist and a way too good player so ofc it’s easy for you. Had that one and some other classics since the start of this thread

[Ritsugamesh]

So we just don't do something because it'd take time? Because it might be hard? Talk about laziness. Someone once told me "If something is worth doing at all then it's worth doing properly" and I hold it to be true. If healing if worth fixing, then healing is worth fixing, not dps. And if fixing healing means going back and rebalancing content then so be it. When I look back on previous content I see healing really start going downhill when tanks start getting increasing amounts of self-healing and damage stops outpacing mitigation by any appreciable margin, the natural result of which is the reduced need for healing, I also see a reduction in interruptible attacks and esuna-able effects during the same period which further compounds the issue.

Unfortunately the vast majority of suggestions in this game get the same response. I can think of countless instances in the past where potentially great ideas get lambasted because of a lack of ambition. It almost feels a little stockholm syndrome at this point.

Let's just think about...

- The glamour system. A glamour catalogue is 100% doable, WoW did it like 8 years ago. Apparently it's too much spaghetti code or takes too much time to implement or too much data or whatever. Let's sweep under the rug you can go to sleep in the inns and view all Mogstation paid content in realtime literally right this second. The system exists.
- The housing system. Unlimited districts is absolutely possible. Multiple MMOs have and do it actively. They make bank with this game, invest in some back so people can have a freaking house. GW2 is launching it - that's a F2P game. LOTRO has private wards that scale infinitely - also a F2P game. No excuse.
- The job identity. It's too hard to make jobs interesting because then the devs can't balance it. Like, isn't that just a huge failing of the talent at CBU3 if they're the only MMO incapable of balancing jobs when they aren't the Spiderman pointing at himself meme?
- Healer design. See above. Too hard. Too much time. Etc. etc.
- Almost every vestigial system left to rot in the game. Which is many.
- The level sync problem. Too difficult to change the system, too time consuming. Let's just keep the crap system we have. Other MMOs have solved this more effectively years ago.
- The ping and latency issues. Third-parties have fixed this in various ways. It's doable.

Every problem is another form of - think of the dev team, it is spaghetti code, too much server strain, data volume per character, hard to balance, too much time investment. It's no wonder nothing changes, and the patches are always the same, and the train keeps moving until the track stops getting laid in front.

[Benji41]

Ya know it baffles me to see players (actual Healer mains) try to defend a job that is really so........irrelevant. I mean take a look at the other support role, Tank. Compare the number of Duties that can be completed without a Tank with those that can be completed without a Healer. It's sad imo. Don't get me wrong, I love a Healer that really cranks out damage in a Dungeon, but if the role restrictions were removed, 3 DPS and 1 Tank would be so much faster (most of the time). I was tanking a dungeon with two melee DPS the other day and the healer died pretty early in one of the boss fights and we still cleared with no issues. This actually made me feel bad for the Healer just laying there dead for 8 minutes or so. Of course I have no idea how to fix this, I just know it needs some attention

[ForsakenRoe]

It doesn't necessarily have to be a fancy new DPS rotation, at least not instantly, but the damage output should be brought up to the same level as Tanks at a very minimum.

Bringing this back just to say: I believe that the 'variety' in what DPS buttons we press is the issue, not the amount of damage we deal, and we should not get the two conflated. You could bring Healer DPS output up to the level of the tanks by simply boosting Glare's potency to 400, sure, but that doesn't fix the issues with the role. It's still going to be bland as heck. It's still going to be one button for the majority of your GCD gameplay. And it's still going to be Healer that gets replaced by DPS to try and pull off nonstandard runs (because trying to do a fight with no Tanks is much rougher due to AA damage, tankswaps etc).

If we get the two confused, SE will have the 'get out of jail free card' to say 'well they wanted more damage, so we boosted their output' and keep the current gameplay. Let's not give them the 'out'. Instead, I think the solution is simple: giving us a more intricate rotation, that is effectively 'optional' due to sensible potency balancing. For example, if we say that SCH has 3 DOTs instead of 1, Biolysis (350p), Miasmalysis (340p) and Shadowflare (320p), if the player ignores all three and just uses Broil (310p) they'll still clear any content in the game. Savage week 1 DPS checks are tuned around giving healers the leniency to drop a lot of GCDs to use healing GCDs instead (doubly so this tier, because the DPS check this tier was weirdly low). The player could choose to spam Broil as we do now, or interact with this 'optional' complexity, rewarding them with an effectively 'cosmetic' boost to damage that has almost zero effect on the group's chance at hitting enrage. But for those who want to optimize, it provides a much more deep gameplay experience, because ANY amount of extra damage is going to be welcomed as part of the optimization (see Energy Drain, even as weak as it now is).

I think the problem with this is already shown by Eukrasian Dyskrasia being made unable to stack with Eukrasian Dosis: some players feel the need to be 'optimal', even when they're not actually skilled enough to BE 'optimal', and the thought of 'I have to put in more work' isn't appealing to said players. And unfortunately there's nothing that can really be done with this, because to me, that mindset is anathema to 'common sense game design principles'. It's possible to make a design that allows a player to play sub-optimally and still clear (even I can make one (or more accurately, four)). 90% of the content in the game doesn't care how sub-optimal you play because there's no enrage timers. And in the 10% that DOES have enrage timers, you can drop GCDs to heal (eg I cleared P11S week 1 with over 30 Succor casts) So as an example, I make a design that gives SCH 3 DOTs instead of 1. Someone says 'I don't like this idea, I don't want to juggle 3 DOTs', I would say 'that's fine, you don't need to', because I tuned the potencies to be such a small gain (as shown above) that it will not make or break a clear. I make a design for SGE wherein Kardia is a much more interactive system than 'targeted fairy heal', being temporarily augmentable with effects like 'stronger', '50% as strong but AOE', 'also applies shields', etc, and someone says 'I don't want to have to mess with all that stuff I prefer healing on SGE as it is now', I'd say 'ok that's fine, the design keeps all the other OGCDs so you can still heal just as you did before if you want, the Kardia stuff is just another tool in your kit that you're free to ignore (it's not like we don't already ignore Pepsis 95% of the time)'

I think the key thing here is that it needs to be clarified that the gameplay of healers shouldn't be 'replaced', instead it should be 'added to'. EG Instead of replacing WHM's focus on GCD heals (that are damage neutral) such as Lily heals, with a more OGCD centric gameplay like the other healers, do the opposite! Go MORE into damage neutral GCD healing, have another system that works alongside the Lilies that allows for damage neutral GCD healing. That way, not only do those who enjoy current WHM have the current WHM still, but they have extra options to avail themselves of if they so choose. And for the optimization minded players, having multiple 'refund' skills like Misery, means that there's a new minigame of trying to line up your healing GCD order in such a way that all of those 'refunds' can all go into the 2min burst, turning WHM into the 'ADPS big burst' healer (which means it'd actually have an identity beyond 'Cure3 bot')

[Bobby66]

It doesn't have to be entirely just buffs to Healers, they can also bring down Tank DPS and have the two meet halfway, but that's even more work.

But "Having jobs be balanced would break the difficulty" is not really a good argument.


So they could just take the loss, drop the difficulty in older and at the moment current content, in order to make future content with properly designed balance between the roles instead of the absolute randomness we have now where some roles are just worse because fuck the players who want to play these roles.

I mean my argument is not that the jobs being balanced would break the difficulty since let us be fair I am willing to bet SE does think overall the jobs are in a good state balance wise especially tank and healers. It is more so that maintaining that level of balance does seem like a nightmare and one I do not see them jumping for joy to do.

Though oddly enough I posed a question on the tank forums if they would be willing to take a damage hit for the sake of balance and for healers. Yeah, that did not go over well. Any nerf to tanks would result in the cult of the bald man to raise up. In short tanks would legit rage and they probably would be listened to over healers and everything would be changed back to the way it was.