#FFXIVHEALERSTRIKE

[ForsakenRoe]

At this point I don't see any solution with people not wanting healers to be good at anything other than healing but never making the healing part ever required in anything other than maybe at best 3-4 pieces of content before it gets invalidated again. Even asking for parity is too much of an ask now.

If SE wants to boost healers to be roughly inline with tanks in terms of damage output, that's up to them. My point is that if we as a playerbase aren't specific with our requests and say 'we want more damage' instead of 'we want more variety in how we deal our damage', it gives SE a very easy out to just boost some potencies and leave our gameplay loop to rot as it currently does. Additionally, we had a small amount of time in SHB where WHM was doing more damage than some of the tanks and they (tanks) were pissed

I'd rather have a fun damage rotation than deal the same damage as tanks. I'd rather take a 25% damage NERF if it means getting a more fun damage rotation, in fact

[CaptainLagbeard]

I mean my argument is not that the jobs being balanced would break the difficulty since let us be fair I am willing to bet SE does think overall the jobs are in a good state balance wise especially tank and healers. It is more so that maintaining that level of balance does seem like a nightmare and one I do not see them jumping for joy to do.

Though oddly enough I posed a question on the tank forums if they would be willing to take a damage hit for the sake of balance and for healers. Yeah, that did not go over well. Any nerf to tanks would result in the cult of the bald man to raise up. In short tanks would legit rage and they probably would be listened to over healers and everything would be changed back to the way it was.

I'm sure tanks would absolutely lose their minds if they ended up nerfed for the sake of achieving balance while maintaining generally the current level of difficulty. Which is why it would probably be for the better to just drop the difficulty for current and old content, so Healers and Ranged DPS can actually be balanced again and not be worse for the sake of being worse.

[Grann-Goro]

Like I said earlier. Where are the Tanks complaining about not really needing to use their mitigation, or tank swaps against normal mode bosses?

Here !
And I add that I also complain about not having to decide where the boss stands on the battlefield anymore.

I'm sure tanks would absolutely lose their minds if they ended up nerfed for the sake of achieving balance while maintaining generally the current level of difficulty.

Oh god no ! At least not me !
Since the very moment I reached level 82 as a PLD at the beginning of Endwalker, I fell like playing with a cheat code !
That's not fun at all.

[Sharawiwi]

Though oddly enough I posed a question on the tank forums if they would be willing to take a damage hit for the sake of balance and for healers. Yeah, that did not go over well. Any nerf to tanks would result in the cult of the bald man to raise up. In short tanks would legit rage and they probably would be listened to over healers and everything would be changed back to the way it was.

Don't make me think about it, I really don't like WAR OTPs in this game xd

A more interesting question would have been : "Would you rather take a nerf to self sustain or have every heal jobs removed from the game ?", if the overwhelming majority of tanks chose the second, SE would listent to them as they outnumber us...

[Alice_Rivers]

Do you want something to get done, or do you want to just complain? We have to be at least somewhat reasonable with our requests if we want anything to get done. "Give us a couple more damage buttons to use when nothing needs healing." is an astronomically smaller task than "redesign every fight in the entire game to require more healing, but not so much that reacting a bit too late causes deaths."
I'm mostly working off of comparison to the healer design in World of Warcraft. Where you heal about 95% of the time, and do damage only if you're really good. You stay target locked on your tank most of the time, and use your filler heal when you have nothing else to do. That's not the kind of design I want in this game.

FF14 is the game that got me to play a healer, I loved it back when I was learning WHM and spent most of my time healing and damage casts were a reward for being good, it's insane and increasingly infuriating that healing is my reward for people failing to see a bright orange area or other obvious bad zone or for tanks (DRK excluded) not bothering to learn their jobs and then I see people like you tell me that I shouldn't care that I'm just a bad dps with better heals and that I should want to be better dps. NO. If I wanted to play dps I'd play a dps job, that's why they exist.

We used to have content in which healers healed, we still do, the devs do know how to design such content, they do know how to design such jobs, they just don't want to and you appear to be fully willing to allow and embrace this design.

What we have now feels like it has a lot more room for player skill expression. The only issue is that the apex of your skill expression is usually just not dropping a Glare cast, or making sure all your Aetherflows go to Energy Drain.

And so instead of healer skill expression being not dropping glares, or heaven forbid being good at healing, you want healer skill expression to be not dropping a glare, then a light, then a something else cast in a row. At that point I circle back to "Why have healers in the first place?" Just make everyone that isn't tank some flavour of dps instead.

[Somnolence]

If SE wants to boost healers to be roughly inline with tanks in terms of damage output, that's up to them.

This would just result in toxicity, because healers are the only role that loses dps due to party making mistakes or co-healer not putting adequate amount of work.

Healer DPS has biggest variance between lower and higher skilled players already - bottom ones do 8K dps, top ones 14k. That is whopping 40% difference.

Now imagine if healer DPS was buffed, then the glare would just be higher potency loss if you had to replace it with medica II or w/e.

The current healer design is dead end.

If the encounter design team considers a healer doing 225 broil casts in M4S and 5 healing GCDs to be intended optimal way of playing them, then the job design team must suck it up and change healers to match that.

[Supersnow845]

This would just result in toxicity, because healers are the only role that loses dps due to party making mistakes or co-healer not putting adequate amount of work.

Healer DPS has biggest variance between lower and higher skilled players already - bottom ones do 8K dps, top ones 14k. That is whopping 40% difference.

Now imagine if healer DPS was buffed, then the glare would just be higher potency loss if you had to replace it with medica II or w/e.

The current healer design is dead end.

If the encounter design team considers a healer doing 225 broil casts in M4S and 5 healing GCDs to be intended optimal way of playing them, then the job design team must suck it up and change healers to match that.

It’s almost like healers should be designed in such a way that doesn’t punish them so heavily for casting a GCD heal.

Maybe……..DOT’s, oh my god it’s almost like they figured this out 5 expansions ago

[Aravell]

This would just result in toxicity, because healers are the only role that loses dps due to party making mistakes or co-healer not putting adequate amount of work.

Healer DPS has biggest variance between lower and higher skilled players already - bottom ones do 8K dps, top ones 14k. That is whopping 40% difference.

Now imagine if healer DPS was buffed, then the glare would just be higher potency loss if you had to replace it with medica II or w/e.

And the reason things function this way is because the dev team redesigned it this way. They claim that they don't expect healers to do damage in their design while also making it much harder to do good damage from ShB onwards.

On paper, it looks very easy. Spam your filler, keep your DoT up, use OGCDs to heal. But in practice, the moment something goes wrong and you have to use your GCD for anything other than your filler, you've already lost a chunk of damage.

That's what happens when they delete every other damage spell and shove all the potency into the filler spell, it makes it that much more punishing to drop a cast. The one creating this environment to be toxic in is the one that created this healer design in the first place.

[Rozeee]

snip

Not only that, the one button design just makes the bad healers stand out even more. Instead of "this healer heals/glares too much" it's "we're dying to lack of heals and still meeting enrage on a clean run".

It doesn't matter if content is perfectly tuned for the average party. If the variance is this large for even just one role, the enrage will be too lax/too tight (hint: arcadion and abyssos)

It's the most awful form of skill expression. The fail state punishes bad players by them hitting enrage, the win state punishes good players by sheer boredom.

[Bobby66]

Of course it wouldn't go well, go to literally any job forum and ask them if they'd like a nerf and the only answer you'll ever get back is a "Hell no!".

I think SE should stop caring what the playerbase thinks about nerfs, nobody will ever like getting their favourite job nerfed, but nerfs and buffs are both essential to balance. Look at the Expedient nerf, most SCH mains agreed that 20s of Sprint was too powerful and they accepted that the nerf had to happen.

Are you saying that tanks would throw a tantrum over a nerf when others would accept a nerf for the health of the game? If tanks would throw a tantrum for such a minor reason then I think SE shouldn't listen to them at all at that point.

My point is SE has shown they have a history to overall listen to tank complaints outside of DRK. That is not the case for healers overall. Given their track record if they complain generally something normally gets done about it. So any nerf probably would be short lived unless overall the tank community felt it was warranted.