Quote Originally Posted by Gemina View Post
That's not the case at all because even if you do enjoy healing in its current state, you are still replaceable in all all forms of content. That was my main point in Cole's video when he talked about being a ride or die SCH, and I wish I could personally tell him that his presence in any duty in this game neither makes or breaks it. The demand from striking healers for more damage options, and/or more punishing content are not their primary concerns. Both have been tolerable of these circumstances in ARR/HW and ShB respectively. It was EW where this ended, but they hoped DT would address the primary issue. It didn't, and now here we are. That is why I am telling you using this angle only dismisses that concern while trying to pit them against each other again. The 'No healer, no problem' is now a meme, and it is for a reason. Because it's true.
Again, the actual state of healers in the game is irrelevant to my point. You're demanding SE spend a lot of money to make a lot of changes. Where is the evidence that those changes will generate a net increase in player satisfaction that is large enough to justify the cost? Absent that evidence, these demands are purely based on personal preference, and what gives your preference more weight than the opinions of players who are happy with healers as-is?