#FFXIVHEALERSTRIKE

[LilimoLimomo]

Just out of curiosity, is the strike still on, or did it end at some point?

[Lorika]

Just out of curiosity, is the strike still on, or did it end at some point?

I don't even know if it even happened to begin with.

[OliviaLugria]

People striking aren't playing healer in df or pf. We're enjoying the game on other roles or have left.

[Zolvolt]

People striking aren't playing healer in df or pf. We're enjoying the game on other roles or have left.

the strike is so wishy washy. "we're striking but not for the first 2 weeks of the expansion"
"we're striking but only for DF and PF so anyone with a static can still heal"

I can't help but point out how moronic the healer strike is.

[OliviaLugria]

I don't really know what to say... the og post literally says we're starting on the launch date of DT and striking by not doing healer in DF.

We're not some paid organization. People show their support in different ways and to different degrees.

[Kes13a]

the strike is so wishy washy. "we're striking but not for the first 2 weeks of the expansion"
"we're striking but only for DF and PF so anyone with a static can still heal"

I can't help but point out how moronic the healer strike is.

thank you for coming in to just bump the thread ^^

[ZephyrMenodora]

I don't even know if it even happened to begin with.

Even if all 405 people who liked this thread Striked, and that number didn't include non-Healer supporters of the thread, and other people who decided not to strike....it's just too small of a number for this to make a dent in a population of millions.

I think the Healer problems already had people leave the role, with Tanks once being the least played class and that now being healers.

[OliviaLugria]

For fourm standards, 400 is huge. It also continues to be the fastest growing thread.

Content creators would never outright support the strike, but some agreed with our points.

However small we are, we are much more vocal about what we want, and a vocal minority tends to have their way over a silent majority.


Finally, SE is never going to acknowledge this thread. Any healer change they make will be due to whatever reason they can come up with.

I am well aware that nothing will probably happen, but there is a chance something will, and I'm alright with one last "hurrah" before throwing in the towel and moving on.

[ZephyrMenodora]

For fourm standards, 400 is huge. It also continues to be the fastest growing thread.

Content creators would never outright support the strike, but some agreed with our points.

However small we are, we are much more vocal about what we want, and a vocal minority tends to have their way over a silent majority.


Finally, SE is never going to acknowledge this thread. Any healer change they make will be due to whatever reason they can come up with.

I am well aware that nothing will probably happen, but there is a chance something will, and I'm alright with one last "hurrah" before throwing in the towel and moving on.

I agree 400 is big for this forum - I said the exact same thing hundreds of pages ago.

As far as being vocal = getting what you want - I disagree. People have been vocal about healers for years. Not at this level, but there has been many threads.

The devs seem to do what they want to be honest. Look at how quickly Viper was changed with pretty much no threads or outcry to remove Noxious Gnash.

[MisterNublet]

Just out of curiosity, is the strike still on, or did it end at some point?

Could say it is still going by the amount of PF Savage parties still looking for healers.