Quote Originally Posted by Aravell View Post
Even should you not accept the removal of dps spells as proof, there's plenty of other proof that they've gone back on their word in regards to the healer role.

Let's look at SCH, one of their core aspects is the fairy, it's supported by lore that Eos and Selene are 2 different aspects and are meant to do different things, they removed all of Selene's abilities in ShB. Now let's look at AST, their core aspect is the cards, the lore states that The Bole has a protective effect, 6% damage boost doesn't seem very protective to me.

They have been destroying the core aspects of the healers since ShB, not only the damage side, but the utility side too.
Which is what I was pointing out...if you're going to make the argument about healers, focus on the healing parts, not DPS.

For what it's worth, though, I'm someone who loves the current incarnation of SCH. Each of the healers are still decidedly unique, but they have enough in common that it's not unreasonable for folks with limited time on their hands to try each one out without being overwhelmed. It's let me see that for me, SCH is now my #1 healer instead of being tied with WHM.