Quote Originally Posted by Renathras View Post
snip
The first point means literally nothing. If you're familiar with the abilities already in play you'll have a much easier time adjusting to a substantial rework of one half of the job than some having to learn both halves of the job.

The second point: if your party hits enrages in ex trials, the problem is a lack of mechanic understanding. Enrages have been so loose in the ex trials this expansion you actually have to put in effort to see them. You can say that you dont care about who is to blame but that doesnt change the fact that the problem in ex trial enrages is not the healer's damage output. Especially if better gear is involved. Good job keeping a group of headless chicken alive enough to see enrage tho.

Third point: do not mix up forum and ingame communication. This is a discussion forum so credentials will rightfully be questioned. If you cant stand your credentials being questioned about a topic you are trying to discuss then you should bow out of it. No static worth your time will reject you exclusively based on logs. If you cant get into a static there are other issues in place. Given your conduct on this forum however I am not surprised.

4th: it's not correct to leave one healer badly designed. What logic is that even? Do we just hit the casino to find out which one it is? I think scholar should be the braindead one because I dont like the job aesthetic and we should give players who leveled smn first access to the easiest healer!