- The first few come from this very conversation, quoting you, having to meet your term and specifically arguing against you using it deliberately as a loaded/conflated term.
- Only in quoting Luin, in drawing DRK/WAR comparisons; motifs were not in question.
- Using the term because that's the term Arch used; motifs were not in question.
- Appears only in the quote before pointing out that it's a loaded term:

Originally Posted by
Shurrikhan
Because it's not "life-leech" per se. It's, quite definitively, living off the thrill of battle. (If we're going to consider technicals, at expense to all lore, like "but it's healing based on damage dealt" then note still that life-leech wasn't originally that; it was bonus damage that happened to heal you by the same amount, quite literally leeching that HP out of the enemy.).
- Using the term specifically because of, and to contrast, Anahalise's use of the term.
- Post discusses WAR, but only uses "life-steal" in the phrase "People make a big deal out of DRK being the iconic life-steal tank to-be, but...."
- Appears only in quoting you. Specifically does not call it lifesteal.
- Term used only in response to your idea that as a WAR, if meeting Kalise's description of a more WAR-thematic raidwide than SiO, you must...

Originally Posted by
Lyth
magically drain life from your enemies and generate party-wide barriers
rather than, say, a simple raid-wide Bloodbath buff via War Cry with overhealing turning into temp HP. "Lifesteal" is only used in saying what did n
ot exist. Positives used the term "self-sustain" only.
- Used the conventional term for concision and because that was the term used by the previous 3 posts made in reply to one another.
- Quoting you, noting that "Granted, I do think there's space for them both to have 'lifesteal,' in very different ways."
- Quoting Whiskey while specifically pointing out the differences between (A) content-based throughput and purely state-based throughput and (B) healing as portion of damage dealt vs. bundled effect.