Results 1 to 10 of 466

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Hamada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Uldah
    Posts
    793
    Character
    Aya Hamada
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 74
    Quote Originally Posted by Awha View Post
    What I am getting at is SE had a chance to do something about this they refused to listen and choose to ignore the player feedback regarding the changes. Look back most people said the changes would not stop selling of houses since all people would have to do is sell the FC, instead of the plot. People warned SE, they ignored it. Even if they did change the system SE already has set the precedent that they will grandfather people into the new set of rules. So once again, what are you trying to get at? Do you want a system change? Fair enough, but personally it seems like you are attacking players that found a cleaver loophole to rules SE put in place, a loophole SE was informed about by the community the moment the changes were announced.
    Once again what are you trying to get it because I responded to this idea time and time again:

    Quote Originally Posted by Chalbee View Post
    You'd think this person has never heard of "just because you can doesn't mean you should." I find it absolutely amazing how shamelessly some people wear their greed like a badge of honor, and seem to expect praise for being the most clever little child in the sandbox.
    It shocks me to no end you are basically saying "SE did not baby us so we can break the rules and not think for ourselves"
    (6)

  2. #2
    Player

    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    3,327
    Quote Originally Posted by Hamada View Post
    Once again what are you trying to get it because I responded to this idea time and time again:

    It shocks me to no end you are basically saying "SE did not baby us so we can break the rules and not think for ourselves"
    I am saying SE was warned about this loophole they did not act on it, so at that point it is safe the assume that they have no issue with it. As I said it is different if you are trying to change the policy to cover the loophole in question, but it personally seems like you are trying to also get SE to punish those that used the loophole that SE was informed about from the start. It is up the company to enforce their rules not the user base.
    (3)
    Last edited by Awha; 07-13-2018 at 08:53 AM.