Quote Originally Posted by Hamada View Post
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJwP...youtu.be&t=334
https://gyazo.com/a10349884445b9da734f4e4eb2c1bea6
So how can you sit there explain how it fits how you define an exploit then say it is not an exploit????????????
Cat here posted said they had to transfer from account 3 to account 2 to bypass that rule, that is breaking 2.1, they explained here how they broke 2.1 of the ToS and made other posts about breaking what I linked in the video.
Because none of it is the result of improperly functioning game code, it is therefore not an exploit. I do not think this concept is the least bit difficult to grasp. I am well aware that SE considers the aftermarket sale of houses to be against the rules, but being against the rules does not make something an exploit.