Quote Originally Posted by Awha View Post
I am saying SE was warned about this loophole they did not act on it, so at that point it is safe the assume that they have no issue with it. As I said it is different if you are trying to change the policy to cover the loophole in question, but it personally seems like you are trying to also get SE to punish those that used the loophole and SE was informed about from the start. It is up the company to enforce their rules not the user base.
I addressed you several times already. Why are you repeating yourself to make me repeat myself? If SE wanted people to do this, they would not make the limitation in the first place, ONE FC HOUSE PER ACCOUNT! Just because they did not baby you, does not mean " so at that point it is safe the assume that they have no issue with it" You are just trying to find excuses for people breaking the rules and yes people need to be punished for breaking the rules. You are right, the company should enforce the rules, that is what I am asking for in this thread, seeing someone openly admitted to breaking them.

Also sweeping purges after an exploit is abused for a while is not new to SE, are you aware what happened when people exploited Salvage bans of ffxi? I am not implying SE should repeat such action, in this case they can take back all the houses bought illegally and put them back up on the market. Also there is a basic moral issue here, you are not free to take 10 of something for one, when 9 have none. SE says do not exploit the game, you can't defend "not doing anything wrong" with that rule, this rule was broke by some, and SE should uphold their ToS.