This is the FFXIV user agreement, the thing you check the box off when you hit next when you are making your account:
http://support.na.square-enix.com/ru...2&tag=users_en
Just because the player base sees a loophole is not an excuse to take advantage of it, right at 2.1 it states:
Then note this:2.1 Cheating and Botting. You may not create or use any unauthorized cheats, bots, automation software, hacks, mods or any other unauthorized software or hardware designed to modify the Game and gameplay. In addition, you may not take advantage of game system bugs and exploits during gameplay.
https://youtu.be/BJwPCxau7CA?t=336
Then there is this:
Now of course we have to toss out the references of reddit and heresay. However, when you name the plots "my ward not yours" that alone fits 3.2, disruption. Naming the houses in that manner is basically admitting you are doing so to grief others. It is showing they want to own a ward for the sake of doing so, so others can't have a house knowing it is limited. Outside the ToS this also crosses a moral ground as well.
Now the breaking 2.1 comes in play when a person flats out state they moved FC house from account 3 to account 2, this fills the requirement of 2.1, a loophole is another way of saying exploit. Also they stated they held housing as personal till they leveled FC to rank 6, they converted them because of:
They flat out admitted the conversion was pure for reselling, since SE stated about the RNG timer on relinquish, they went out to convert their personals to FC. You are going to tell me this situation is perfectly legal with all the statements they stated, along with what is stated in the ToS, on top of what Yoshi-P said on reselling housing? Inheriting a FC from inactivity is a lot different then rapidly transferring FC house ownership to bypass a restriction and frankly converting personals to FCs that mysteriously happened after SE announced the RNG timer thing. I am sure they have logs of gil movement and other things to prove one thing or another. You very well know that last line of yours is an attempt to get off the subject to defeat a weaker argument. I want to post and explain why people should be doing the right thing, not finding loopholes to get away with something, when again there is 2.1 saying that is against the rules, so there is no defense in acting in this manner.



Reply With Quote

