Results -9 to 0 of 537

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player Violette's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    545
    Character
    Eonkhui Malaguld
    World
    Tonberry
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Shining_Tiger_Excalibur View Post
    snip
    Sorry, I didn't make myself perfectly clear in the original post.

    Warrior's should be the most selfish, in order to balance out the trinity of tanks. But as you said, and as we all agree warrior's are the king of tanks.
    Most damage+most utility where the only danger to tanks (besides healers) is big bad tank busters....Dark Knight and paladin were designed for a different type of game and it's showing with each tier of raiding.

    Especially Dark Knight......we're not the tankiest naturally (as in just in tank stance), but we have a lot of cooldowns to pop. This to me sounds like it would much better suit a game where the raid patterns weren't set in stone, so you could use cooldowns as you went to defend yourself. Sure we have the defences to deal with all tank busters that come our way, but even without them bosses are very rarely a danger once the pattern is known.

    As for
    Sure, I suppose. You think PLD should be buffed, I think it'd be more interesting to see WAR nerfed. Sounds like we both want the tanks to be balanced though. I did say many times in my OP though, that none of it was meant to be taken too seriously, and that I was spitballing. I mean yeah, I do think WAR is a little OP, and I've been saying things throughout this thread to try and get people to discuss that because I was genuinely curious to see what people felt about the degree of WAR's power in the current meta.
    Nerfing a class for being good at what's it good at and good at what other classes are meant to be good at......is a foolish move. It's a better design move to bring all 3 classes to an even playing field by bringing things up, then nerfing.
    (0)
    Last edited by Violette; 09-25-2015 at 01:09 PM.