This feels like a dangerous topic lmao
This feels like a dangerous topic lmao
it/its - 14 accessibility is bad, ease of access is not accessibility, jobs are boring. Transphobia ruins real attempts at criticism and it's whack.


Moving on from that, it just seems weird that the level 50 we experiance now and the level 50 experienced in arr is completely different. Level 70 in stromblood get like the end for many jobs, but now it feels oddly sparse. Maybe that's the normal experience for mmos.
No thanks for servers that bring back old gameplay.
Make the actual live game the way it used to be instead, and more for healers.
Everytime someone asks Yoshi P. about bringing 1.0 servers back, he dies a little inside.

The discussion wasn't about 1.0 servers - that's unanimously a bad decision. It would be 2.0 or 3.0 servers, essentially ARR or HW era.
It would be an intriguing experiment to see how the community receives the game from that era, as it mostly had many of the problems we face solved (that is not to suggest that it didn't have it's own larger issues which have since been solved by the modern version).
I mean I LOVE crusty bad things. I'd love to play 1.0 even if it is a bad idea.
But I'm obvs more invested in playing 2.0-4.0 than 1.0 lmao
But it's all extremely pipe dream stuff imo (I say as an old school runescape player so.. maybe I don't know anything at all, wow classic sure did happen too I guess)
I feel like them still running 11 is already their version of this in a way
it/its - 14 accessibility is bad, ease of access is not accessibility, jobs are boring. Transphobia ruins real attempts at criticism and it's whack.

I played more 1.0 than anyone really should have. Had a dream the other day that someone managed to fully host a private server of 1.0 and I was playing it. Woke up disappointed. Bad idea or not there's some things about 1.0 that I really liked and would enjoy reexperiencing. Never gonna happen though and, obviously, would be a wasted investment from SE.
There was TP and no party finder yet. It was a different game almost. You might find it funny for about an hour, eventually realizing that it was inferior.The discussion wasn't about 1.0 servers - that's unanimously a bad decision. It would be 2.0 or 3.0 servers, essentially ARR or HW era.
It would be an intriguing experiment to see how the community receives the game from that era, as it mostly had many of the problems we face solved (that is not to suggest that it didn't have it's own larger issues which have since been solved by the modern version).
Depends on the kind of player. There's a reason I like ironman in RS removing access to the marketboard which makes it slightly more like the way the game used to be. I like a little inconvenience in my games sometimes.
it/its - 14 accessibility is bad, ease of access is not accessibility, jobs are boring. Transphobia ruins real attempts at criticism and it's whack.
One thing they could do for April 1st or something is to open a PTS with 1.0 on it. STO did that a few years back, it was kinda cool, it also reminded people of good things the devs had removed from the game over the years.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote



