And that somehow contributed to the discussion? :/ I feel like you've just wasted my time. X.X;
I don't understand how AoE stoneskin makes WHM more special than SCH. :/ "Yay I can save 10 seconds during buff period over my SCH partners". That makes WHMs unique and special? Really??? It's not your superior AoE healing, regen, benediction etc That parties are bringing you to fights for? Do you guys think so little of the rest of your skills that you can't just throw SCHs a small bone in the form of a QUALITY OF LIFE change.
Can't respond in a new post due to daily post limitations. SMH SE
Anyway, you and other WHMs brought succor into the discussion in the first place. I said before and will say it again, succor is not the equivalent of SSII. That's why WHMs shouldn't be asking for it and that's how my comment contributed to the discussion. Maybe if WHMs would stop bringing up succor into the discussion, I could stop talking about it too?\
Son of a... This is getting annoying.
Because we use it anyway to prebuff the party? If it's that non essential, then maybe we shouldn't even be able to cross class SS. The truth is that we do use it to prebuff the party because SS gave us the skill in the first place. Since it's there, I'm damn well going to use it. The argument for not giving SCHs SSII is that we should take longer to prebuff a party than a WHM. That's all there is too it. We're asking for a convenience not for your lunch money.
I feel like we're just running in circles here with me just repeating myself. I've stated many times why I feel like SCHs should get SSII. Can you please name for me some good reasons, besides coding issues, why SCHs do not deserve the same convenience that WHMs now enjoy?
I contend that it should've been implemented as a passive part of SS and that there should be a trigger which senses whether you are in or out of battle and adjusts accordingly. Also, please give me a good reason why WHMs NEEDED SSII. There's no compelling reason either besides convenience. I'm asking for the same thing for the same reason.



Reply With Quote




