#FFXIVHEALERSTRIKE

[Kohashi]

I don't necessarily agree that HOT spells (ie GCDs) are inefficient, wasteful, etc. I think that their 'usefulness' is simply a victim of 'how much gear do I have'. In something where you have low gear, or the item level is locked to make it 'always hard', (aka, week 1 Savage or Ultimate), HOT GCDs are pretty good in terms of 'efficiency'. It's when we outgear the fight by 20 ILVL because we have BIS, and people take less damage because they're also in BIS (higher Def/MDef stats) that we feel we don't need those spells anymore, because our OGCD kit can handle the healing required.

For example, I don't want to imagine trying to do something like Natural Alignment from P8S, in Week 1 gear, without using Medica 2 or Regen to keep HP levels more stable. Maybe AST could get away with it even in Week 1 because it had so many OGCD options (with a lot of them on a 60s CD), but I tried AST there in prog like a single time, got hand cramps from trying the opener on loop, and thought 'it's not worth the effort or the discomfort'

The only instance where Medica 2 was remotely an option was during High Concept because the boss left the arena so there was no need to DPS. But then again, was very niche because it had a limited area of coverage. Search for Arthars tree incident to have a laugh and also see why medica 2 was a bad choice instead of a oCGD heal.

[Supersnow845]

The only instance where Medica 2 was remotely an option was during High Concept because the boss left the arena so there was no need to DPS. But then again, was very niche because it had a limited area of coverage. Search for Arthars tree incident to have a laugh and also see why medica 2 was a bad choice instead of a oCGD heal.

I remember a time when medica 2’s entire NICHE was it had 5 more yalms on it than succor or aspected Helios

Ironically this is one time when medica 2 isn’t the issue, or is it HOT’s in general, it’s bloat of pointless oGCD’s too many of which have HOT’s attached to them when they don’t need it

[Maltothoris]

Provide high-end instances where medica 2/3 is a better option than Afflatus Rapture is for example.

There is no reason not to do Rapture considering it's a DPS gain overall with a 20s replenish.




Sure. because there are better spells that achieve better results. The only instance where Medica 2, regen, and Cure 2 are valuable is in low-level dungeons. Otherwise, there is very little incentive to use them.

Another example is Physis 2 where what you want is not necessarily the HOT but the 10% extra heal which not only strengthens your shield but makes subsequent spells heal more when you have a timeframe where you take repeated raidwides. (like intermission into multiple strong hits in phase 2 of m4s).

Hello World from TOP, A fait bit of Ucob, the second boss in mount rokkan criterion savage, the start of the eye phase from Dsr, tea soft enrage before perfect alex. Thrte still a few parts where its more useful than rapture.

[Tigore]

Sure. because there are better spells that achieve better results. The only instance where Medica 2, regen, and Cure 2 are valuable is in low-level dungeons. Otherwise, there is very little incentive to use them.

Another example is Physis 2 where what you want is not necessarily the HOT but the 10% extra heal which not only strengthens your shield but makes subsequent spells heal more when you have a timeframe where you take repeated raidwides. (like intermission into multiple strong hits in phase 2 of m4s).

Yeah, there is a point here for the reference frame of Normal difficulty dungeons. The Afflatus spells take priority over Regen and Medica 2 / 3. As well as Asylum and Temperance. By the time I am used up on the Afflatus spells, Tetragramaton and Divine Benison, usually no damage is happening with a break period and the tank is fine with their own cooldowns. The only time I typically used Regen is before a pull starts during Endwalker's end times of 4 man Expert.

[PercibelTheren]

Provide high-end instances where medica 2/3 is a better option than Afflatus Rapture is for example.

There is no reason not to do Rapture considering it's a DPS gain overall with a 20s replenish.

Not everyone is playing White Mage. Yes, there are instances where you have better options, but that's not what you originally said, is it.

[WaxSw]

Another example is Physis 2 where what you want is not necessarily the HOT but the 10% extra heal which not only strengthens your shield but makes subsequent spells heal more when you have a timeframe where you take repeated raidwides. (like intermission into multiple strong hits in phase 2 of m4s).

???????

The value of physis 2 regen is higher than the 10% you gain from the shields. If the party doesn't need that extra 10% to survive wasting effectively a 650 potency heal for a gain of at best (assuming no Gcd) 200 (60 extra potency from holos and 120 potency from a fully used panhaima) is a massive waste.

Physis is used on those scenarios because its an efficient hp heal on a low cd. The 10% buff is just a nice addition

[ForsakenRoe]

The only instance where Medica 2 was remotely an option was during High Concept because the boss left the arena so there was no need to DPS. But then again, was very niche because it had a limited area of coverage. Search for Arthars tree incident to have a laugh and also see why medica 2 was a bad choice instead of a oCGD heal.

I have looked up 'the tree incident'. Medica2 vs Rapture has nothing to do with it, the range on Rapture and Medica2 is 20y for each. The bigger issue is 'the player didn't do their job of healing, because they were busy making a tree', and that's got nothing to do with 'are HOTs good/not good'. The player who Arthars pointed out, who he was expecting a heal from, was within healing range of Arthars with both Medica2 and Rapture, from the moment Arthars stood in position to make his wind-bird-thing merge to the moment he died. Even as they were messing around making a tree, they were well within the 20y range

But hey, since you say 'the only place Medica2 is an option is High Concept cos it's downtime', here's a clear VOD of a group, week 1, using Medica 2 for Natural Alignment 1.

And here's another. And here's another, this time from the POV of the WHM.

And you know what, just for good measure, here's Arthars' own clear VOD, where his WHM also uses Medica 2 for Natural Alignment.

[Kacho_Nacho]

I have looked up 'the tree incident'. Medica2 vs Rapture has nothing to do with it, the range on Rapture and Medica2 is 20y for each. The bigger issue is 'the player didn't do their job of healing, because they were busy making a tree', and that's got nothing to do with 'are HOTs good/not good'. The player who Arthars pointed out, who he was expecting a heal from, was within healing range of Arthars with both Medica2 and Rapture, from the moment Arthars stood in position to make his wind-bird-thing merge to the moment he died. Even as they were messing around making a tree, they were well within the 20y range

But hey, since you say 'the only place Medica2 is an option is High Concept cos it's downtime', here's a clear VOD of a group, week 1, using Medica 2 for Natural Alignment 1.

And here's another. And here's another, this time from the POV of the WHM.

And you know what, just for good measure, here's Arthars' own clear VOD, where his WHM also uses Medica 2 for Natural Alignment.

Yeah, I don't get the hate directed at Medica 2. White Mages are supposed to use their gcd heals too, right?

As an aside, I wonder if a big step toward making healing interesting again would be to scrap most of the ogcd heals and barriers from our kits? It seems that relying so much on them is why a lot players feel bored. There is no decision making when you are pushing buttons which make the green bars go up instantly.

[ForsakenRoe]

Yeah, I don't get the hate directed at Medica 2. White Mages are supposed to use their gcd heals too, right?

As an aside, I wonder if a big step toward making healing interesting again would be to scrap most of the ogcd heals and barriers from our kits? It seems that relying so much on them is why a lot players feel bored. There is no decision making when you are pushing buttons which make the green bars go up instantly.

Medica 2 is a case-by-case thing. If it's possible to handle the healing via Rapture only, then that's the better option (because it refunds the lost damage). The main thing that works against Medica 2/3, is the gear level of the group compared to the content you're doing. If you outgear it like crazy (eg you have BIS), you take less damage, you know the fight better, you have your other healing tools better mapped out, so M2 loses a lot of its allure. In early prog, or content like an Ultimate where you're forced to a certain item level, the usefulness of the GCD HOTs massively increases. There's not really much that can be done to 'make the GCD HOTs better in all scenarios', because some content just doesn't need them. For example, an EX roulette dungeon you're never going to need those HOTs. I once tried to do the maths of what would be required, to 'force' the player to need to use that HOT in an EX roulette (back when Aetherfont was the latest dungeon in EW), and it worked out as something like 'the first boss has to throw out a raidwide for 25k damage, once per 15s, on top of all the damage it already does with the way it's currently designed'. That extra damage is just to burn through all the OGCD options we have at our disposal. And the amount of extra damage would be vastly different between healers, so what might be 'enough to be a solution' for one healer might be too much for another, or too little for a third. An AST can handle a lot more incoming damage with damage neutral healing a lot easier than WHM, as it has 3 different 700-ish potency options with a 1min CD (CO, CU, Star), so it can simply rotate one of those per 15s, and then cover that last 15s raidwide with Horoscope (200p) plus digging up 500p from somewhere else in its ridiculous DT kit. Lady of Crowns is 400p on its own, but it could also dip into the ST heals like the THREE charges of ED, TWO charges of CI, Exaltation, or any of the 3 'healing-related' cards (not you Arrow) and spread those across the party to handle that last raidwide. So then we're back where we started, with AST able to completely handle that massively increased damage intake via OGCDs, meanwhile WHM is struggling to keep up because 3 Lilies per minute is 400p each (600 with PI, but it won't be up for all 3 unless you play risky and don't heal the raidwides right as they happen), Asylum (900p, 90s CD) and Lilybell (180s, and it'd only catch a max of 2 raidwides due to the auto-detonate)


I think that, after so many years of designing healers in this direction, to have free, accessible, numerous OGCD tools to deal with the majority of the healing requirements in a fight, I don't know how feasible it'd be to switch over to a more GCD focused design for the entire role. It can be argued when the direction began, whether it started in ARR thanks to SCH fairy actions like Whispering Dawn, started in Heavensward with the addition of things like Asylum/Tetra and SCH got Indomitability, or cemented itself in Stormblood when AST got Earthly Star, SCH got Fey Union, and WHM got shafted, due to remaining in the 'GCDs that cost damage' phase. Either way, it's been well over 6 years of this design, and certain 'evergreen' content like Ultimates is dependent on such a kit existing in its current form. For example, if they were to remove a lot of the OGCD actions from, say, SGE, and make it a lot more focused on E.Prognosis/E.Diagnosis casts, a fight like TOP would likely fall apart, because of things like the DPS check, the Mitigation checks that already expect such a barrier with every raidwide, etc. Everything would have to be rebalanced and rechecked, and it just seems like far too monumental an undertaking to complete, when the team's already struggling to keep up with the current content pipeline

I feel like the idea of 'GCD healing focus' isn't really strong enough to be a role-wide thing, the way it is now (where it's 'WHM's thing') makes more sense to me, it makes WHM feel unique from the other healers. As much as I give WHM flak for being dull in its gameplay, the Lily system undeniably gives WHM the advantage over the other healers, in terms of 'GCDs that are not the filler spell', thereby reducing how often we press Glare per 2 minutes. In a scenario where you're just hitting the boss and trying to maximise damage (with no 'damage-loss GCD healing' required), a SCH presses Broil 44 times per 2min, a WHM presses Glare 3 just 35 times (33 Glare3, 3 Glare4, 4 Dia, 6 Lily heals, 2 Miseries, 2 bonus Glare3's due to POM's speed boost).

So rather than removing the OGCDs from SCH/AST/SGE, and effectively 'trying to make them more like WHM', I think it'd be better to look at other things that can be improved about the healers. And one of the most Glaring (ha) issues, is how often we press our filler action compared to others, when we have the inevitable downtime between required healing. One of the biggest things about this current healer design direction they've got, is how little space they have to actually add anything to healers now. For example, we see for SCH, we got a new super-powered CD where its effect is... we heal super hard (literally stronger than Cure3, and for less MP!). But SCH already had crazy access to healing, so this action feels quite unnecessary in a lot of situations. It's also incredibly divisive, in terms of its VFX. I think that when SE removed so much damage options from each healer, they also closed a lot of design doors on themselves. By having a tiny bit more depth in what we can do to deal damage, a lot of space opens up to create new interactions within the kit.

I keep using an example, of a 0-100 gauge I made for WHM that builds by casting non-Lily spells (with healing spells generating it faster). Just by adding that gauge (and a spender that costs 50 gauge), it allows for:

- Different attack actions that build gauge faster compared to the filler spell (for example, I suggest a 15s CD GCD, Water, that gives 5 gauge, while Stone gives 1 gauge)
- Incentive to keep the DOT active, beyond 'it does more damage-per-GCD than the filler' (for example, I suggest that Aero/Dia be 12s Duration, and grant 5 total gauge over that duration (1 on cast, 1 per tick))
- Space to add an action that increases the gauge instantly by X (EG Infuriate on WAR)
- Space to add alternative actions that spend gauge, potentially with varying costs. For example, a gauge spender takes all the currently accumulated gauge, that scales based on gauge consumed
- Space to add actions that synergise with the gauge, or the spender (for example, my suggested spender (damage neutral AOE GCD heal) could trigger Plenary Indulgence's healing effect, or be boosted by Temperance)

When we look at something like WAR's gauge in single target, it's very simple, you build 50 and you press Fell Cleave. But it also has Infuriate to grant 50 instantly, it upgrades your FC to Inner Chaos for one strike, it has a feedback loop where FCs reduce the CD on Infuriate, the existence of FC allows for Inner Release, Inner Release existing allows for Primal Rend, and now in DT, Fell Cleave and Inner Release existing also allows for Primal Wrath and Primal Ruination to now be added. All of this, from a simple idea back in ARR/HW of 'Hit enemy, get stacks. Get 5 stacks, do big hit'. I'd like to see interactions like that within the Healer damage kit, not just because it'd make our damage-dealing more interesting, but because it'd allow our gameplay to more smoothly 'flow' between damage, and healing. Especially on WHM, we'd be able to 'heal to fuel our damage' via Misery, and then 'damage to fuel our healing' with this gauge, creating a 'cycle' in our gameplay

this got long sorry

[Alice_Rivers]

It kind of makes sense that Medica gets a lot of scorn, it costs a lot of MP and most of the time is completely unwarranted, as others have said Rapture does it better and isn't a dps loss (a mentality we probably shouldn't have as healers but with little meaningful healing to do I guess that's inevitable), I was one of those people who kept 100% uptime on it until someone said I didn't have to and eventually I reconsidered. The thing is for a new healer it's a trap, they see the partywide regen and it looks like a no-brainer, not realising that it's a complete waste of MP and GCDs in the same way as Cure 1 spamming instead of transitioning to Cure 2 - The game does nothing to disabuse people of this practice either.

I think if damage were higher and more frequent then people who do spam these things would routinely run out of MP and have to reconsider their strategies, or stop healing.