Quote Originally Posted by linayar View Post
What do you mean what's the big deal? I'm just answering the confusion you stated in your post.

The point remains, if "underperforming" is defined subjectively, then it's irrelevant. If it is defined objectively, then it must be relevant to the objective of the content.

And no matter how much you want to talk about potentiality, tank losing aggro and healer not healing has a bigger potential for not completing the objective than simply dps not putting as much damage as tank/healer.
Thing is it is only irrelevant into relation to SE doing anything about. They will not, nor do I recall saying that performance is an objective metric if I did sorry, I to recall saying the that the outcome of a vote in a party is an objective metric but I do not recall saying that regarding performance. I have always been in the camp that standards are subjective and that is what creates this issue in the first place cause we all have different views on the matter.

Sure it may hold more potential but as mentioned but the degree of potential trouble does not matter to me I am a action driven person. I operate on a very binary system. If one action can cause a similar outcome no matter how likely or unlikely I will not do said action. Unless I am willing to live with the consequences. IRL it has different implications though in the game as mentioned and I agree one carries higher risk of wipe but to me the risk factor does not devalue the action itself. I judge them on the action and not the outcome.