Results -9 to 0 of 3534

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player Theodric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    10,051
    Character
    Matthieu Desrosiers
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Reaper Lv 90
    I've explained a number of times throughout the thread. The block function can be used for any reason whatsoever. Players have the luxury of freedom on that front. If someone is spamming chat with emotes or random nonsense they can toggle the block function on for that player. On the other hand, they could also opt to do it for no reason whatsoever and block players who they have never even interacted with.

    Should the block function be removed because it supposedly infringes upon the rights of the players who are blocked for no discernible reason? No, it shouldn't. The people against this idea are mostly overthinking it. Client side tweaks are client side tweaks. It really has no bearing on other players as they're highly likely to never be aware that their glamour is being blocked and even if they are, they have no business dictating how other players tweak the game to their liking unless it involves third party tools which are illegal.

    That aside, many people want the function to be implemented for various reasons as stated throughout the thread. As such, the hyper focus on specific glamour options is a bit odd when the function is requested for a broad purpose.

    Ultimately I'm all about player choice. That means I'm fine with people asking for glamour options to be expanded. Though it also means that I'm all for people having the choice to opt out. I don't think there's anything particularly unfair or hypocritical about it. Yet for some reason many of those seeking to have the development team expand glamour options seem to want to 'get back' at players who do not like such things themselves. Which is all very strange to me!
    (6)
    Last edited by Theodric; 02-20-2020 at 09:20 PM.