Monk should it be "Nerfed" ?

[Lambdafish]

snip

I apologise for the vagueness, what I was calling "the bottom" was SAM and to some extent SMN and RDM. To me the ranged role is a different scenario entirely, and I really don't want them buffed in damage at all.

It's highly off topic, but I would rather they give BRD back foes, give MCH back dismantle, and add refresh and palisade back in as role actions. Then once that is done, adjust the DPS within the role itself. That will give the role a tonne more identity and worth within fights beyond them simply competing with MNK, DRG, and BLM in damage.

[Shurrikhan]

I apologise for the vagueness, what I was calling "the bottom" was SAM and to some extent SMN and RDM. To me the ranged role is a different scenario entirely, and I really don't want them buffed in damage at all.

It's highly off topic, but I would rather they give BRD back foes, give MCH back dismantle, and add refresh and palisade back in as role actions. Then once that is done, adjust the DPS within the role itself. That will give the role a tonne more identity and worth within fights beyond them simply competing with MNK, DRG, and BLM in damage.

Doesn't seem particularly off-topic. If the interest of nerfing MNK is solely rDPS balance, that can still come from personal or indirect sources, so bringing BRD/MCH back up to the balanced point should include discussion of whether we want them to be nearer in %pDPS to now or to SB.

Personally, I want more support on each, but just not in the style of Bard's passive "as long as you're singing" buff.