Results -9 to 0 of 407

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Anesteria's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    71
    Character
    Isavella Jerisfaldar
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Blue Mage Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Physic View Post
    yes, people can miss something that does not exist, invention doesnt come from nothing it comes from needs/desires.

    i already told you, before blue mage, they had contraversy around jobs not fitting the spirit of their FF design. bard, being primarily a dps, summoner not having smns with giant OP Skills. red mages not being jacks of all trades..
    No they can't Physic. Unless they're time travelers, it would be impossible. The concept of "limited job" didn't exist until they created it, it is not something that people already knew that it was called "limited job" that it would have BLU as its first class along with everything down to a tee that was to come with it. And that's not even the entirety of the issue, because Yoshida's statements IMPLY that it could not have been any other way when he deems the "limited job" as the only thing that would allow such enjoyment when they know they could have created something that was well within their potential to do that had nothing to do with a "limited job" system.

    Unlike the Blue Mage, this was created in a vacuum. So they're not comparable, as I said earlier, people wouldn't be complaining about BLU's existence, as they do with the "limited job" system. BLU is an established job that has worked within its own games according to the game's own gameplay, without necessitating any "limited job" that didn't even exist at the time, FFXI included and the most eclatant example being a MMORPG. Yours, and Yoshida's position are indefensible, you are grasping at straws.

    "the dude" is the Director, he's not random low-level employee number 3901, he's supposed to have a certain capability. Ion is the same as him, he's there to put on the face and give the best pr responses and try to swivel out of tough questions because any of them would have to show commitment or admit they're wrong, and they need to cover their tracks so that they can claim "Ah but we did NOT EXPLICITLY say that X was our objective/that Y was how things were going to pan out".
    (5)
    Last edited by Anesteria; 03-19-2019 at 01:38 AM.