Tank dps harrasment

[Sarteck]

No, the subsequent confrontation was when the woman was off the clock at a completely different store. The person she was in an argument with just happened to be a frequent customer at the store we worked at. An off-the-clock confrontation/situation directly led to her being fired. Because that customer knew she worked for our store. Please read my post again.

And she was arguing on your company's behalf, from something that did happen while on-the-clock. I'm not really seeing much of a difference there.

Again, your analogy doesn’t work. Companies do perform background and social media checks for prospective employees. And even for current employees. They give you the social media policy when you talk to them about being hired. Next time, take the time to go over it and read it.

Again, my analogy works perfectly fine. Of COURSE companies are going to do background checks. What they will NOT do is base evrything off of you from a few drunken images that someone else happened to post.

I don't get what's so hard to understand about that concept.

[HyoMinPark]

And she was arguing on your company's behalf, from something that did happen while on-the-clock. I'm not really seeing much of a difference there.

She wasn’t actually—the two had bumped shopping carts, and a bickerment started from that.

Again, my analogy works perfectly fine. Of COURSE companies are going to do background checks. What they will NOT do is base evrything off of you from a few drunken images that someone else happened to post.

I don't get what's so hard to understand about that concept.

Yes, they will. And their social media policies say as much. I don’t know what’s so hard to understand about that.

[Sarteck]

She wasn’t actually—the two had bumped shopping carts, and a bickerment started from that.

Okay, and...?

Yes, they will. And their social media policies say as much. I don’t know what’s so hard to understand about that.

I'd certainly love for you to show me a company that will fire (or even not hire) you based on someone else uploading a drunken picture of you.

Please, do share these companies' social media policies and let me know where they say that. If you can do that, I'll concede defeat.

[HyoMinPark]

Okay, and...?

I'd certainly love for you to show me a company that will fire (or even not hire) you based on someone else uploading a drunken picture of you.

Please, do share these companies' social media policies and let me know where they say that. If you can do that, I'll concede defeat.

The burden of proof actually lies with you. Prove to us that a company won’t care about you having pictures of yourself on social media websites of being a drunken slob.

[Sarteck]

The burden of proof actually lies with you. Prove to us that a company won’t care about you having pictures of yourself on social media websites of being a drunken slob.

I'm not sure you know what "burden of proof" is.

If you are making a claim, you are the one that has to support it.

[Oscura]

I'm not sure you know what "burden of proof" is.

If you are making a claim, you are the one that has to support it.

You were the one who made the claim in the first place that no one would fire or refuse to hire someone because of an embarrassing or disgusting picture. Saying you disagreed with the mentality regarding FFlogs because it would not happen in another instance.

So yes, the burden of proof actually does lie with you.

[Sarteck]

You were the one who made the claim in the first place that no one would fire or refuse to hire someone because of an embarrassing or disgusting picture. Saying you disagreed with the mentality regarding FFlogs because it would not happen in another instance.

So yes, the burden of proof actually does lie with you.

Oh really now?

So I have to post the company policies of every company in existence and let you comb through them all, versus you having to show me one?

No, that's NOT how "burden of proof" works.

EDIT: Unless you're telling me taht I can just go and show you any company that does not have this fictional policy.

[BigRed5392]

Okay, and...?

I'd certainly love for you to show me a company that will fire (or even not hire) you based on someone else uploading a drunken picture of you.

Please, do share these companies' social media policies and let me know where they say that. If you can do that, I'll concede defeat.

you don't watch news out;ets much. I suggest phill defranco on youtube. People have been in the past fired over pictures on social media. Such as school teachers. Google it.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.3509411 here is 1

here another one http://fox8.com/tag/teacher-fired-over-facebook-photo/

another one http://www.nj.com/middlesex/index.ss...censes_fo.html

so yes it does happen

[ElHeggunte]

you don't watch news out;ets much.

[...]

so yes it does happen

Another good example is the woman who was just fired because someone snapped a picture of her flipping off Trump's motorcade in spite of the fact that she was on her own time and the picture showed nothing connecting her to the company, nor did any of her social media profiles. The company still said it was "bad for their image" and terminated her anyway.

Slightly ironic in that she's the one who told her company about it. Since you can't see her face in the picture it's unlikely they would have been able to identify her if she hadn't said anything.

When I tank I try to do good at my job and make everything easier for the party.
However if someone ever brings up I'm not doing enough DPS, when I tank. I report them. There is no built in way to really know how much DPS someone is doing.

If you're familiar enough with the class you're looking at you don't need a parser to tell when someone is sandbagging it even if they're not playing poorly in an obvious way. Using the wrong moves, not landing positionals, casting the wrong spells, not using CDs, having too much MP, having too much TP, standing idle for long periods of time--these are all things that lead to subpar performance and they're all very easily observed with your eyes.

[Kewitt]

If you're familiar enough with the class you're looking at you don't need a parser to tell when someone is sandbagging it even if they're not playing poorly in an obvious way. Using the wrong moves, not landing positionals, casting the wrong spells, not using CDs, having too much MP, having too much TP, standing idle for long periods of time--these are all things that lead to subpar performance and they're all very easily observed with your eyes.

Wrong moves, Ya but basic rotation, tanks have 3 combos, for there primary rotations.
We are talking about Tanking. Outside of overpower what Positionals, What DPS spells, (I don't know anything about DRK at all),Sorry as a warrior MP not an issue. PLD Self cures and flash oo Not DPS... Having to much TP Means Your spamming overpower to much. Being AFK is being afk.

Saying that Gear > Skill in FF is wrong on so many levels.
Also War is great in SB, it's not weak at all when played properly. And another thing, reporting anyone who says you're not pulling your weight is a pretty childish behaviour, whether they use a parser or not, just saying.

It's not or people wouldn't be able to clear turn 9 still but GEAR is greater then > skill.
As soon as people over gear for content you get to skip phases of battle. This isn't skill this is gear being greater then content > skill.

Also for basic take a look at this.