Ah.
That's what I thought was happening. That it was just replacing DS. I really hope so. =/ It would suck if WHM lost ANOTHER spell.
Then please, do me a favor and calculate with the numbers we know, and then tell me if WHM truely has more than 600 DPS over the other two healers. Because I'm rather sure that would be more than we got. Besides, it would take a LOT of uptime to achieve that, which again would mean low healing requirements, which again would mean faceroll trololo difficulty in raids. It would also make lillies even more redundant than they already are. And that's not something I want to see. Them essentially pushing WHM into a off-heal DPSer niche also runs contra to their recently reinfirmed statement that healers are not supposed to DPS, so... why push a healer into exactly that niche? Sense?That really just depends on what the number is. Assuming that the added dps from either is 300-600 effectively, all the WHM would need to do is be capable of dealing that increased amount on their own. Or more. So a WHM that can deal that much more in comparison to their cohealer would be good. Say, AST with the second highest dps does 2k on average, while a WHM does 3000 on average. That's a 1k added dps bonus over the AST's 600(assumed) average added contribution through cards, and WHM could substitute for an AST when dependable damage dealing is needed rather than an unreliable dps buff that may never appear.
I mean. It's just common sense... that seems to be the niche they're trying to push WHM into, like SAM.
The overcure trait ( for cure III) has been removed and apparently the skill was missing during some of the expos.
And yes, skills and traits that have been removed are still listed on the datamined lists (stoneskin, shroud, divine seal, stone with heavy, etc. are listed as well)
Last edited by Seraphyna; 06-16-2017 at 08:55 AM.
I had a look at some of the datamining posts on Reddit to make sure. It's still there, don't worry.
As it stands now you lose about 2k raid dps just from the opener by not having AoE balance. And that's just one, never mind the multiple you'll probably get throughout a fight. WHM has no chance in making up the difference.That really just depends on what the number is. Assuming that the added dps from either is 300-600 effectively, all the WHM would need to do is be capable of dealing that increased amount on their own. Or more. So a WHM that can deal that much more in comparison to their cohealer would be good. Say, AST with the second highest dps does 2k on average, while a WHM does 3000 on average. That's a 1k added dps bonus over the AST's 600(assumed) average added contribution through cards, and WHM could substitute for an AST when dependable damage dealing is needed rather than an unreliable dps buff that may never appear.
I mean. It's just common sense... that seems to be the niche they're trying to push WHM into, like SAM.
Well, I'm not seeing Stoneskin on this list so I'm gong to say I'm pretty confident they have it.
If you look at the raw ability list it is still there. The same with Scourge, Shrouds of Saints and a lot of other removed skills.
They won't simply remove things like this from the data to avoid a major headache with bugs and errors.
Last edited by TheAngelneer; 06-16-2017 at 09:48 AM.
But they're all under the Adventurer class, set to unlock at level 0, so they're easily removed from comparisons.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.