Quote Originally Posted by Kurenai_Night View Post
Oh I see. So we should be forced to deal with it because the proponents say the opposite? "I like seeing this." "It should exist." ?? How about the proponents have tolerance? Why is it that we are the only ones called selfish? The argument works both ways. A person who doesn't like it and doesn't think it should be implemented has just as much say so as the one who wants it implemented.
I think that's part of the point. It should work both ways, but this content is being developed on the assumption that it doesn't.

A certain subset of men like seeing female characters in skimpy outfits but would rather not see males in skimpy outfits. So fine. They can get what they want. A similar subset of women like seeing male characters in skimpy outfits but would rather not see females in skimpy outfits. Well, tough. They're not allowed to have opinions on either point. That would go against what the men want.

It's that mismatch in what different players are being given that led to this whole discussion. If some players preference to see females in skimpy outfits justifies their inclusion in the Gold Saucer, than other players preference to see males in skimpy outfits justifies their inclusion as well. Or if you're going to go with the opinion that some players preference that males not be given more skimpy sexy outfits is reason enough for males not to get them, then it's equally reason for females not to get them either, because there are other players bothered by that.

So, regardless of whether you think the right to see them outweighs the right to not see them or vice-versa, it should do so equally for both genders. Either give a skimpy outfit to both genders or don't give one to either.