Honestly, if it was, I don't quite remember it, but if that is the case and this oversight was fixed, would it not be more of a reintroduction of an already solved issue?
Guess that depends on how you look at it, really, cause I do see your point. This is where communication from the devs could help. A clear "yes, this is intentional, we want the class to be negative" would help clear this up, I think.
RIP Viper 28/06/2024 - 30/07/2024. It was a fun month.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.



Reply With Quote


