Results -9 to 0 of 659

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Bobby66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    947
    Character
    Paper Wait
    World
    Mateus
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Saraide View Post
    Well what constitutes a rule break worth going after is the central question of this entire thing, isnt it? For that it could not be less helpful and constructive than to point at the exact letters of the ToS.
    If we go based off the current ToS then isn't going after those that use any 3rd party tool a rule break worth going after? What information would be more helpful and constructive to use to determine what is a rule break worth punishing?

    Quote Originally Posted by Elesh View Post
    If a petty thief, a shoplifter, gets run over by a car... is he a victim?

    I'd say yes. You can be a criminal ANd a victim. The people have broken a fairly minor rule with very minimal harm to others. So yes, the punishment from SE is justified. But the targeted harassment of the community was not justified. And thus I'd say yes, they qualify both as rulebreaker and victim. And while their punishment should hold... as I said earlier in this thread, the people who orchestrated the harassment campaign for no reason? They should be banned too. Because they're far worse for the community and harassment is DEFINITELY also against the ToS. Including using 'reporting' as a form of harassment.
    I would not say those are the same, the shoplifer is a victim of being hit by the car. The case regarding the 3rd party tools they are victims of targeted harassment, they broke a rule and got reported. The targeted harassment is a byproduct of their rule break. I mean maybe if the shoplifer was hit by the car trying to avoid the police and did not look both ways and ran into ongoing traffic then yeah I would also say they lose all rights to being a victim in that regard also.

    Yes it is against the rules but the problem with the report as a form of harassment is one of those things you cannot objectively prove and I doubt anyone wants GM's to ban people on feeling or subjective takes. I agree on a personal level it is harassment, but I will say best way to protect oneself from that form of harassment is to just not give such people ammo.
    (1)
    Last edited by Bobby66; 05-20-2022 at 04:38 AM.