Would this compromise for positionals work?

[Navnav]

And still pointless arguments from the same guy over and over again... "Me so hyped, Mnks Less positionals now, me playing SMN instead!"

Other games are either action-MMORPGs or sit on <1.5s with a decent ressource-management. Both is engaging compared to 2.5s. With such a slow gameplay, you don't have much options to keep the gameplay fast and engaging. That's why oGCD's and positionals exist.

How long do you play FF14? Mid-shb? Jumped on a hypetrain? Your old claims about MNK has already been laughable. But always this "Positionals have been bad from beginning" claim, when they clearly worked since FF's re-release and dozens of ppl find them engaging, is just........

How's it going bunbun? Hope you're good.
You're kinda proving my point, but yeah stay salty I guess.

[ssunny2008]

How's it going bunbun? Hope you're good.
You're kinda proving my point, but yeah stay salty I guess.

Which point? You mean "mechanical depth and interesting gameplay" without positionals, meanwhile you seem to main 1 button classes like SMN / SGE and broken WAR now, because they offer so much depth?! You prove yourself to be a selfish troll yeah, nothing else.

[Navnav]

Which point? You mean "mechanical depth and interesting gameplay" without positionals, meanwhile you seem to main 1 button classes like SMN / SGE and broken WAR now, because they offer so much depth?! You prove yourself to be a selfish troll yeah, nothing else.

I do love them all. Not really into SMN that much tbh, but really like WAR and SGE tbh. DPS wise I like MNK and RPR a lot. I mix it up a lot and love to play that way. Crazy that I can huh, all I have to do is pay for the game and hey presto, I can play what I like how i like. Funnily enough the dev team saw things from my perspective without ever probably seeing a single post of mine. But hey, great minds and all that.

Have a nice day chap.