Quote Originally Posted by Ryaduera View Post
I cannot be more clear here. I will say it again but use more emphasis. The problem is not Dark Missionary. The problem is the way the class uses it.

[...]

So how does Dark Missionary lose effectiveness on DRK? Easy. Anything that reduces damage taken devalues TBN because DRK wants TBN to break to get Darkside. If the shield does not break that is a DPS loss. So here's an idea. The DRK gets instead a party-wide mitigation tool that redirects 30% of the DRK's HP from the party, distributed equally among all affected party members, to the DRK. An AoE cover, but less effective. This is roughly 3.75% (30 divided by 7) of the DRK's max HP as a "shield" to the party. You're still reducing raid damage and if you put TBN on yourself for this, it synergizes well as it will probably break the shield. Adjust the cooldown accordingly. (Numbers also adjustable, I am not a balance expert)
I'm sorry, but in what <kupo> world does Dark Missionary devalue TBN when it invreases the effective HP it provides? If you use TBN and it didn't break, that is you overmitigating damage that didn't need mitigation, leave alone the fact that there is like a handful of situations where using DMiss and TBN on self make sense to use in the first place.

If TBN didn't break, 95% chance it was overkill to begin with and Souleater heals along with passive HP regen would likely keep you alive.

I get if you say DMiss isnt unique, but to say it devalues TBN is just not right man. Additional mitigation doesn't devalue TBN, but poor usage of TBN does.