The decline of the community

[Awha]

Your other take was that children should face the same punishments as adults. This take isn't just worded differently, it's an entirely different take: that we should inform and educate.

By inform and educate I mean before they do the action before doing things meant for adults then try to cry foul on the adults despite knowing it was not meant for children and they still do said action at that point then little timmy should face the same punishment as an adult. Cause screw this better to ask for forgiveness instead of permission mindset.

I think having a focus on educating after the fact is kinda backwards, the education should front loaded, and if the action is committed after the point it is okay to inform and educate again, but they should face the same punishment as an adult for the action they committed.

[Vahlnir]

By inform and educate I mean before they do the action before doing things meant for adults then try to cry foul on the adults despite knowing it was not meant for children and they still do said action at that point then little timmy should face the same punishment as an adult. Cause screw this better to ask for forgiveness instead of permission mindset.

Kids, by nature, do not always use good judgement, even when they know what they are doing is wrong. I would know. I was one! Adults are expected to be better than that and act their age (though some never outgrow such immaturity), as well as adhere to various societal standards and laws to a much higher degree. So yeah, I'd say different punishments are largely warranted. Not saying that kids should be let off the hook for their behavior, but it comes down to what I said already. Things should be handled differently depending on the situation.

[Awha]

Kids, by nature, do not always use good judgement, even when they know what they are doing is wrong. I would know. I was one! Adults are expected to be better than that and act their age (though some never outgrow such immaturity), as well as adhere to various societal standards and laws to a much higher degree. So yeah, I'd say different punishments are largely warranted. Not saying that kids should be let off the hook for their behavior, but it comes down to what I said already. Things should be handled differently depending on the situation.

Yeah overall I am not a huge fan of varying degrees of punishment for many things. I think across the board we should have harsher punishments. Personally from experience when I did messed up shit as a kid, I cannot say it was solely based around poor judgment per-se and more so I knew I had a decent chance of getting away with it with either a slap on the wrist or no punishment at all. I just had to spin the situation my favor. Granted, I do come from a position of privilege in this regard that many are not afforded.

Sure my judgment was poor in the sense that I did said action, but that part that titled the scales on my head from not doing into doing said action was the protections provided to me being a child at the time. I also do not think this way of thinking is all that uncommon as people may like to think it is.

Ironically enough, they themselves probably aren't aware, as neither are many people in the community It should at the very least be within their guideline to supply such information to people when they're sanctioned.. I can partially understand why they themselves don't directly supplement the logs- Certain information needs to be redacted as they're potentially exchanging information pertaining to another character with you that they otherwise probably shouldn't. People have done this before and had the respective logs sent to them- It's actually on Reddit.

I get your grievance at least, but in the same vein, the implementation of a filter should not preclude one from being reported and sanctioned accordingly. I hate to be hubristic about it, but if I've learned anything through my life it is that people will typically only tell part of the story, and the part of the story that paints them as the victim. I don't agree that the use of a single non-derogatory profanity should be enough to warrant a sanction, or even being reported for that matter, but I do believe excessive use of profanities should warrant it. But you yourself have exemplified this- You were asked to stop and potentially politely too, yet you didn't oblige and still went on the crusade it would seem.

Everyone is held accountable for their actions to varying degrees- For example; It just happens that someone stepping into a mature environment whilst not of appropriate age has much less of a sanction than if someone within the environment were to do inappropriate things with said person. But then I still hold the opinion of- Just don't publicly advertise mature scenes to a potentially non-mature audience. You save those with the overabundance of curiosity from putting themselves in harm's way- Just as you save people in the environment from doing something they otherwise absolutely wouldn't. A profanity filter is just an additional tool so that you don't have to expose yourself to profanities. It doesn't mean you shouldn't be reported for it by someone else though, as petty as it might be. But then we get into the scope of differentiating profanities from slurs, and insults, and arguably many people that get reported for it, arguably probably fall into slurs and insults more than pofanities.

I would not say it was a crusade, in game I tend to just drop F-bombs often generally they are not aimed towards anyone and if they are it is mainly myself. If I screw up I say F*** sorry my bad, or eat an AoE I say F***!!! generally harmful things of that nature. At the time I felt no need to adhere to their request cause my language was not being aimed towards anyone, even someone in the group asked why did they turn the filter off if they did not want to see curse words.

What you saying regarding the profanity or even adverts would make sense if largely these actions were opt in instead of out. I could be wrong but I do believe the filter is opt-out so someone has to purposefully turn it off, which should be seen as a form of consent personally imo. Same with venturing into those 18+ RP venues, normally one has to willfully go into said venue and I get things are murky cause one can generally lie about their age etc . . . and within current system the onus is on one running the venue. Just in my view that is messed up someone can get in trouble for something they willfully sought out. Sure it could be due to a lack of judgment, but in the end it was still a choice the person had to make. We should respect the choices people make, and also hold them accountable for their actions it is a two way street.

[MilkieTea]

Kids, by nature, do not always use good judgement, even when they know what they are doing is wrong. I would know. I was one! Adults are expected to be better than that and act their age (though some never outgrow such immaturity), as well as adhere to various societal standards and laws to a much higher degree. So yeah, I'd say different punishments are largely warranted. Not saying that kids should be let off the hook for their behavior, but it comes down to what I said already. Things should be handled differently depending on the situation.

This 100%! children inherently just, lack the proper functions to analyze their actions and how they affect others - punishment should mirror that. Which is why education after the fact *and* before the fact is necessary. You teach timmy not to steal a candy bar, and if he does do it (because he thinks he can get away with it) you put timmy on timeout and then teach him again. Now he knows two things - one, he can't get away with it and two, that it was wrong to try. You don't put timmy in prison and tack a $5000 fine to his head.

[Awha]

This 100%! children inherently just, lack the proper functions to analyze their actions and how they affect others - punishment should mirror that. Which is why education after the fact *and* before the fact is necessary. You teach timmy not to steal a candy bar, and if he does do it (because he thinks he can get away with it) you put timmy on timeout and then teach him again. Now he knows two things - one, he can't get away with it and two, that it was wrong to try. You don't put timmy in prison and tack a $5000 fine to his head.

I have been little timmy, and I still did said action because the punishment did not outweigh the benefits of my crime. I am willing to bite the bullet that I was a weird kid that was fully aware of what I was doing, and that may not be the case for others. Though generally given the sphere I grew up in the consequences of my actions did not outweigh the gain I got. Generally it would have been dumb of me to not do the action cause it nearly always resulted in a net positive.

I am sorry maybe back then kids did not know better, but I will say nowadays that really does not hold up. Hell as my old man once said, the shit I knew at 6 he was finding out when it was in high school. Kids are generally mindful of what is going on, but as kids we are / were good at playing the system to our advantage and to a degree some are even taught to do.

We use to have this one teacher that gave people the benefit of the doubt that we just played her all the time to get out of work and shit like that. We are / were monsters. Though I am willing to concede that it might due to the privilege / status I was afforded so may not be the same. Though sadly I will never just buy the whole kids do not know thing, cause I was a kid I full well knew what I was doing was wrong, but did not care cause it would have been even more silly of me to not do the action and make out ahead in terms of overall benefit of my own wellbeing. Got to maximize my own personal wellbeing that is the way many kids I was around thought.

Though if the punishment outweighed the benefit of my action then I would most likely not have done it.

[Ceridwenae]

Kids, by nature, do not always use good judgement, even when they know what they are doing is wrong. I would know. I was one! Adults are expected to be better than that and act their age (though some never outgrow such immaturity), as well as adhere to various societal standards and laws to a much higher degree. So yeah, I'd say different punishments are largely warranted. Not saying that kids should be let off the hook for their behavior, but it comes down to what I said already. Things should be handled differently depending on the situation.

To add to this: it's currently thought brain development (and by extension, sound decision-making ability) continues into approximately the mid-20s - with some suggestion even the 30s. So even individuals otherwise considered adults may not always be savvy in the things they do. But otherwise, I concur with what you say here.