5.0 WAR is a disappointment

[Khimer]

I will "give up" when someone who very obviously doesn't understand the jobs he's speaking about, stops acting like he does. You can go "oonga boonga press button on CD" as much as you want, but it doesn't change the objective reality of the situation, and that objective reality is that a job whose entire rotation is capable of being changed per-fight to optimize is inherently more complex than a job whose rotation is always the same, with its only alterations being occasionally having to change an ability usage here or there in order to maintain a buff. But please, continue on with this. You're getting more and more desperate for the subject to be dropped as you probably understand that you don't have any basis with which to stand on, and it's entertaining me.

Yeah you still press the same buttons on gnb, i don't know how that proves your point. I want the subject to be dropped because it already covered everything in my first reply to you, but you still drag it out, making same points i debunked on my first message. Literally all your arguments are: "Warrior is easy, you scrub. - Yeah, it is easy. But compared to gnb you have to think a bit more in fights. - No you don't, warrior is easy." And like that for multiple pages already.

[Lucy_Pyre]

Yeah you still press the same buttons on gnb, i don't know how that proves your point. I want the subject to be dropped because it already covered everything in my first reply to you, but you still drag it out, making same points i debunked on my first message. Literally all your arguments are: "Warrior is easy, you scrub. - Yeah, it is easy. But compared to gnb you have to think a bit more in fights. - No you don't, warrior is easy." And like that for multiple pages already.

Except for the part where you have debunked nothing and, in fact, have only proven how little you understand both of the jobs you speak of. You are objectively incorrect and it really is that simple, not that I'm surprised that you can't accept that given that everything I have seen more or less has proven my initial assumptions to be correct.

[Khimer]

Except for the part where you have debunked nothing and, in fact, have only proven how little you understand both of the jobs you speak of. You are objectively incorrect and it really is that simple, not that I'm surprised that you can't accept that given that everything I have seen more or less has proven my initial assumptions to be correct.

You gotta be trolling at this point.