Lopsided reports?

[Sunoske]

How would you know that? They are not supposed to talk about things like who they have sent warnings too, all you know is that they were not interested in hearing you out as they had already formed their decission on the matter, and they presented what actions they were taking towards you as a result of said decission.

Unless you already know this fact (it has been unclear between your defending yourself and trying to diminish the concerns about this data when people have asked you), in which case I don’t know How you can make a topic asking people if they have had similar experiences with loopsided reports as you nor the people answering will be able to tell this as it is information you don’t have access to. This is of especially high importance if you are actually going to write an assignment on the topic.

You honestly confusing me. o-o I'm just trying to get some kind of number on how many people may have had an experience like this, hell I'd even take experience from the other side of the spectrum to make it even. The numbers could very well be on anything or even made up, I'm just deciding to have some fun with my assignment.
I honestly don't care if the other person got a warning, I'm not even upset for the warning personally, I did what I did because they upset me to that extent, and I knew the potential consequences. I just don't understand what you're contributing to the discussion with when you posted something I know, and was already pointed out previously.

[Awha]

Someone showed me a screenshot of a... forceful, non-consenting sexual encounter *cough* posted in Novice Network. The poor, poor lad was just trying to get his ERP on but seemed to have forgotten to Alt+R.

In this case, he could have very well been reported but it was an honest accident. I would be curious on what would happen if a GM saw the full context.

It would be interesting, I do wish GM's had a place where they could talk about how the process works or how they would handle hypothetical situations would make for some interesting reading.

[SuperfastJellyfish]

If you‘re doing this for an assignment I can only encourage you to reach out in other places as well (forums, facebook, twitter etc). The amount of forum participants is already pretty small and I‘d assume the amount of people that have been reported is tiny.
However considering you have to do it in a certain timeframe (if this is for your studies) you might be out of luck to get enough responses from people with a strike in a timely manner. All you can do is reach out on other platforms as well and hope for the best.

[Sunoske]

If you‘re doing this for an assignment I can only encourage you to reach out in other places as well (forums, facebook, twitter etc). The amount of forum participants is already pretty small and I‘d assume the amount of people that have been reported is tiny.
However considering you have to do it in a certain timeframe (if this is for your studies) you might be out of luck to get enough responses from people with a strike in a timely manner. All you can do is reach out on other platforms as well and hope for the best.

I have a good week! so I'm not too worried, I'll just keep posted. I will try other places as well though! thanks!

[Lunavi]

You honestly confusing me. o-o I'm just trying to get some kind of number on how many people may have had an experience like this, hell I'd even take experience from the other side of the spectrum to make it even. The numbers could very well be on anything or even made up, I'm just deciding to have some fun with my assignment.
I honestly don't care if the other person got a warning, I'm not even upset for the warning personally, I did what I did because they upset me to that extent, and I knew the potential consequences. I just don't understand what you're contributing to the discussion with when you posted something I know, and was already pointed out previously.

The concern is the title of the thread that speaks about lopsided reports which is data you can’t measure with available data for players, which implies this and your entire OP makes it sound like you are worried about the fact that the one who reported you’s reaction was not being taken into account by GMs. If it is if people have had similar experience with GM, which is why people put such heavy emphasis on that part of the topic. If that is not your intention, the topic title is doing a huge disservice to the purpose of this thread.

[Sunoske]

The concern is the title of the thread that speaks about lopsided reports which is data you can’t measure with available data for players, which implies this and your entire OP makes it sound like you are worried about the fact that the one who reported you’s reaction was not being taken into account by GMs. If it is if people have had similar experience with GM, which is why people put such heavy emphasis on that part of the topic. If that is not your intention, the topic title is doing a huge disservice to the purpose of this thread.

Or perhaps you're putting words and ideals of what you would do, onto me? I've stated to simply ask if anyone had anything similar happen, if they know or feel something did, they will speak up, otherwise, what is you point?

[Divinemights]

Or perhaps you're putting words and ideals of what you would do, onto me? I've stated to simply ask if anyone had anything similar happen, if they know or feel something did, they will speak up, otherwise, what is you point?

This is a direct response to you question: no. GM under SE policy is known for being good at their job. You did something disruptive and you get punished. End of the story.

[Sunoske]

This is a direct response to you question: no. GM under SE policy is known for being good at their job. You did something disruptive and you get punished. End of the story.

You didn't even read the discussion, I'm going to assume the first post as well. That question you quoted wasn't even too you, but to the woman who keeps repeating herself even though I've let them know it's just to see how many people feel they have had similar happenings. If you could please read not just jump in and play the "You did something wrong Ooooh!" Card like a child.

[SerLuke]

So this became about a homework assignment after the OP got pushback?

[Jybril]

So this became about a homework assignment after the OP got pushback?

Yes, because he didn't mention this until later.

Which has been said, time and time again.
They have the logs. It isn't the matter of "He said / She said" because they can see what all was said.
They don't care why you said it, they did what they should and warned you for it.
I highly doubt this is a some sort of homework assignment of getting warnings off a video game when it's justified.
The proof is in the pudding, and in this case, the chat box of the game.
Not sure why there needs to be some "People who got warned only!" gathering here about it.
Really isn't that big of a deal.
Just stop being toxic in the game lol.