I mean "it's boring" is a real issue if you're wanting to enjoy what you're playing.![]()
I mean SCH is in a good place in that it works well and is efficient and heals well and DPS's well. But that's meaningless if the job is no longer enjoyable to play. Just as people saying "there's nothing wrong with WHM" your saying "SCH is in a good place" is not wholly fair. Versus AST pre 5.05 then yes SCH and WHM were ahead of AST and well balanced in that respect, but there are valid complaints all round, even after AST got a boost and SCH got Energy Drain back. But I think those who focus on the numbers or how useful they are, they are kinda missing the point, the crux of complaints is not "balance", it was a little more so for AST but they've made steps to try and fix that already.
I think all healers are in a position where they feel dumbed down and less interesting to play for a good deal of people. If it were an issue of skill, I think my complaints of healer downtime would be less valid.
With regards to representing all, people will generally talk about fixes for the job that they play simply because it's the job they play. Whilst I wholeheartedly agree WHM and AST need their love, I don't presume to know best for their job. I figure those who play it know better than me.
With all that said, many threads HAVE been inclusive of other healers and some have been focused on specific healers. But in terms of putting in your own two cents, I think it makes more sense for WHM's to represent WHM's, AST's to represent AST's and SCH's to represent SCH's, because who am I to say how WHM's should be fixed when I rarely play it?
This thread I believed was only created because at the moment it seems SCH's have quietened down. We also have threads about why there's not so many WHM posts. But all it boils down to is the number of people who play those jobs coming to the forums to complain about them, which is a given.