One can give any reasoning for a belief. For it to be truth one needs real evidence. Like one could say I think he killed a man, he has that look in his eye. But I know he killed a man would require hard evidence.Exactly, my meaning doesn't change in either statement. One just hedges bets against uncertainty. But I got another question, in which statement would I be required to provide evidence to back up my assertion? Is someone allowed to make the statement I think he killed a man without providing evidence and argumentation to support that assertion?
So in other words I can go back and add adjectives to my statements like "likely" and "probably" and it makes all of Shippuu's demands for evidence effectively moot even though what I am stating in the sentence doesn't actually change. Nor will I have to actually defend them giving all the arguments on this subject he gave. Correct?
Last edited by Karl0217; 02-18-2019 at 12:11 PM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.