[Suggestion] SAMURAI

[silentwindfr]

I'm not advocating anything either way, I've personally stated earlier I would be fine with either one, however Silentwindfr, if someone posts on a thread that I spent time and care into creating for the public to see and then to have someone say without any solid ground "its not unique because I say so" you better be ready for the "advocacy" of me defending the IDEA of my creation.

As proof of this too, if you notice I have liked EVERY SINGLE POST in this thread even ones that you have posted, because honestly if it were to be a tank cool, if it were to be a dps cool, hell if they made it a healer it'd be cool. But don't $#!% on my idea because you say so and say something isn't unique when you didn't even fully comprehend the idea in the first place. Thanks.

sorry, i guess i have gone too far myself... believe me i will be happy with either way too... but i really feel that the spot of tank for a sam will be redundant with the warrior. even if we make it a more technicall jobs based on a tight management of tp and carefull cycle. if it fail as tank, it will be a trouble. seriously a jobs with less mitigation and almost as much hp than paladin is... bad. the trouble of the balance is not about only number but about the possibilty. like said, if your sam tank don't parry 2-3 time in row he will be into a dangerous situation. even the healer will have a hard time for keep it alive.

for make simple, if it's too hard for healer to maintain the sam, they will not take it as tank... they will prefer the easy solution of the warrior and paladin. because it work like this, people are idiot... they often choose the perfect group with perfect combinaison of skill. if the samurai is not a good tank that bring something new, it will only be played by a few player.

There are more than just 2 people thinking SAM will be a tank. But, you keep thinking that ;-)

it's sure, probably more than 1000 people... who know.but it was more about shippu and omega_hack