Quote Originally Posted by SulwynCaliope View Post
Why did WHMs ask for it? Because it made their lives easier and not because they needed it. Maybe they shouldn't have made a fuss over it till SE caved? The issue is that SE gave SCHs access to Stoneskin. We use it as extra mitigation before the fight even begins. Why should SE give WHMs only an extra, non game breaking, QoL change when SCHs are using the skill in the exact same way for the exact same purpose. I don't think that SCHs should get everything a WHM gets. If I wanted WHM toys, I'd play a WHM and not SCH. What I'm asking for here is a QUALITY OF LIFE change. I don't know why some people can't understand the concept of QUALITY OF LIFE.
Because SS is native to whm and because sch has already an aoe native skill aka succor? Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't mind having SS2 on both since I play both, but i see it as overpowering towards sch, when sch has aoe galvanize which when critted is pretty OP, and on top of that sch already crosses the simple SS. Convenience at pull? If you already succor the party before pull, and on top of that you would have SS2, wouldn't it make your party pretty much invincible and ready to go without even waiting? The sch would just cast his succor and SS2, call out the fairy and go afk even more and from earlier on (halfway kidding there). And with the long cast of SS2 you are forced to swift it, which with succor you would be wasting the swift.

And about the "mentality of this game is perfect as it is, stop saying its not"... The game is certainly not perfect and it won't be, you can't just please everyone, but for once, with this QoL, whm catches up a little on the healer popularity.