dev1031 You are losing your main playerbase by making things too easy/fast/casual

[Argh]

Changing subject already? How funny. So your idea of "challenge" is walking around for hours in an environment that you've already seen hundreds of time avoiding some monsters led by a predictable artificial stupidity? Oh the challenge lol.

There's no challenge in wasting people's time needlessly. The challenge is in giving people actually challenging content to face. You know, content that will make you FAIL if you aren't good enough.

Avoiding aggro monsters while walking around is brain-dead easy.
Time sinks involve no challege. All they do is described by the word itself. Time thrown in the sink. Wasted Time.

what subject change? i simply quoted you. i guess i should ask, shaking in your boots now? can't stand a challenging argument? i guess by your logic arguing over the internet is a time sink and we should not have to do it, lol. you want your instant gratification now, i bet. you just want to win the argument without a challenge.......

[Mugiwara]

what subject change? i simply quoted you. i guess i should ask, shaking in your boots now? can't stand a challenging argument? i guess by your logic arguing over the internet is a time sink and we should not have to do it, lol. you want your instant gratification now, i bet. you just want to win the argument without a challenge.......

lol WIN...

[Abriael]

what subject change? i simply quoted you. i guess i should ask, shaking in your boots now? can't stand a challenging argument? i guess by your logic arguing over the internet is a time sink and we should not have to do it, lol. you want your instant gratification now, i bet. you just want to win the argument without a challenge.......

Honestly I don't find arguing with you very challenging. Your arguments are extremely shaky to begin with (and more often than not are just a personal attack, which isn't an argument at all). They're pretty much a timesink

You accused me of having "1400 posts defending this game", but you still didn't back that claim.

dude, i just laughed out loud in my chair. thanks, lol!

Laughing isn't an argument. Try actually countering mine with one of your own. That's how discussion is done.

[Argh]

Honestly I don't find arguing with you very challenging. Your arguments are extremely shaky to begin with (and more often than not are just a personal attack, which isn't an argument at all). They're pretty much a timesink

You accused me of having "1400 posts defending this game", but you still didn't back that claim.



Laughing isn't an argument. Try actually countering mine with one of your own. That's how discussion is done.

dude i have to laugh because you still get up for another round even though i destroyed your "time sink" argument.

i noticed alot of your posts. you always defend the game. ffxiv has done no wrong and it can do no wrong from your standpoint. someone can simply track your posts through your profile if they really don't mind the "time sink"......

[Abriael]

dude i have to laugh because you still get up for another round even though i destroyed your "time sink" argument.

I'd have to make you aware of the fact that you saying that you "destroyed" an argument doesn't mean that you did.
Everyone's able to pull up some jibberjabber and then writing "I destroyed your argument!". In fact you didn't even try to counter my response

You very conveniently changed subject with a personal attack.

i noticed alot of your posts. you always defend the game. ffxiv has done no wrong and it can do no wrong from your standpoint. someone can simply track your posts through your profile if they really don't mind the "time sink"......

Quite obviously you didn't track my posts enough if you think I ever said that "ffxiv has done no wrong and it can do no wrong". I mentioned quite glaring flaws of the game in this very thread, not to mention many others.
Extremising my standpoint because you can't counter it in it's original essence is called a strawman argument. I don't think I need to remind you that it's a quite big logical fallacy.