"The Adventures of RNG!" Top 3 Hamlet Provisioner

[Judge_Xero]

an extra 25% chance to get a seal is pretty significant but its still 25% meaning you have a 75% chance to not get one. Bad luck is bad luck it sucks but does it need to change? I don't think so this step is what is gonna determine if you have it in you in the first place.

Just going to start with....RNG/Grind has nothing to do with whether someone is able to beat Ifrit Extreme/Garuda/AV,CC 17 minute runs, so therefore your statement is false. Unless you mean it in some other context, which is possible.

I agree the RNG system is brutal and the Hamlet design could be tweaked to reward more effort as well.
(Token drops to trade for seals, when over 65k, and it takes 50 tokens for 1 seal)

1) Without the competition to top 3 positions, Hamlet Levels will not benefit. This is a community issue. If people are not willing to work together for a common goal, they will most definately compete for the greatest prize (#1 Provisioner)
2) If say, Lvl 2 Hamlet guaranteed seals each and every run, but required 100 Million points to reach, after 1 month, if the community could even cooperate to build that many points and 50% of the population got their seals, the other 50% would be SOL.

Now would it be better to have seals available for maybe, the top 10 Provisioners?
Scaling it down by 10% ranges wouldn't work (100% would essentially be the same as 60% over 10 runs. So 5 top positions
to fairly easily get seals)

Maybe 10 top spots for seals, but 100%,70%,50%,25%, ---10% for Provisioner 5 to 10.

I do feel bad for the OP, as he is my LS mate, but in the bigger picture, what about the 4th provisioner @ 1.1Mil, 5th Provisioner @ 900k.... they didn't get to even battle the RNG, for a similar effort.