Relic Weapons-Broken Promises

[Reika]

The part that Irks me is that Paladin requires a double meld of Hells Eye IV, while some other Jobs relic requires Mind IV, which is just plain imbalanced. One is super rare and expensive materia, other is materia I have plenty of since it is common. "Relics aren't for everyone" Doesn't even pertain to this problem.

[Crimzon]

The part that Irks me is that Paladin requires a double meld of Hells Eye IV, while some other Jobs relic requires Mind IV, which is just plain imbalanced. One is super rare and expensive materia, other is materia I have plenty of since it is common. "Relics aren't for everyone" Doesn't even pertain to this problem.

If you're trying to 2x meld Hell's Eye IV onto PLD weapon, I think you might have larger issues tbh.

[Reika]

If you're trying to 2x meld Hell's Eye IV onto PLD weapon, I think you might have larger issues tbh.

Heavens Eye, my bad >.> Point still stands. The relic quest would be just fine without the double meld portion. It would still be long as hell, and it would still have a lot of RNG involved. Double Meld part is just stupid.

[Almalexia]

The part that Irks me is that Paladin requires a double meld of Hells Eye IV, while some other Jobs relic requires Mind IV, which is just plain imbalanced.

How? PLD gets ACC on their relic; WHM gets MND on theirs. This isn't a bait-and-switch. Your relic is everything you meld plus more.

How about a trade? MNK can have that "imbalanced" 40ACC, and PLD can have this super-duper-fair-and-balanced 70MP.

[Reika]

How? PLD gets ACC on their relic; WHM gets MND on theirs. This isn't a bait-and-switch. Your relic is everything you meld plus more.

How about a trade? MNK can have that "imbalanced" 40ACC, and PLD can have this super-duper-fair-and-balanced 70MP.

I suppose it is imbalanced in multiple ways then. AF/Relic weapons were done wrong. I would prefer to have the enmity of warriors weapon on my paladin weapon over accuracy myself.