Housing needs to be account based

[Raven2014]

I dont expect you to understand if you are not part of the housing community though and that's okay.

I have 2 houses in the game, including a Mansion at plot #2 in Mist and I had them probably for 5-6 years at this point, the other one is a small in Kurogane that I relocate from a Mist beachside front. I think it's kinda bold of you to assume everyone who is part of the "housing community" gotta think the same way you do. Are you assuming the people who complaining about the system and want improvement must be be homeless?

It's ok if you don't understand why some of us don't covet the joy and satisfaction of having some kind of virtual exclusiveness ... but do try anyway, it'll widen your perspective. This is about not gate-keeping the "majority" of the players from a major piece of content (one that's often found at the front of the game advertisement I might add), not just an issue between the have and have not.

I am enjoying a feature of the game.

Good, and there is no reason for why that feature have to be exclusively available for just a small portion of the players. No matter how many other people have a house, I doubt it will affect how I enjoy "my house". But then it looks like we don't have the same type of ego.

[Stormpeaks]

I have 2 houses in the game, including a Mansion at plot #2 in Mist and I had them probably for 5-6 years at this point, the other one is a small in Kurogane that I relocate from a Mist beachside front. I think it's kinda bold of you to assume everyone who is part of the "housing community" gotta think the same way you do. Are you assuming the people who complaining about the system and want improvement must be be homeless?

It's ok if you don't understand why some of us don't covet the joy and satisfaction of having some kind of virtual exclusiveness ... but do try anyway, it'll widen your perspective. This is about not gate-keeping the "majority" of the players from a major piece of content (one that's often found at the front of the game advertisement I might add), not just an issue between the have and have not.




Good, and there is no reason for why that feature have to be exclusively available for just a small portion of the players. No matter how many other people have a house, I doubt it will affect how I enjoy "my house". But then it looks like we don't have the same type of ego.

It really is not about ego, I think everyone should have a small house at the very least, that's why I advocated on the last page for improvements to the ward system with what I call "dynamic wards", the problem being that it costs money that obviously SE doesn't want to put in.

Dynamic wards are basically:

Ward 31 is full. Larges,mediums and smalls are taken.
Ward 32 opens.
Rinse and repeat until everyone has at the very least a small house.

It also creates more mediums and larges in the process.

Literally everyone wins, that is the solution, not instanced.

What is lolcow?

This dude literally just made an account to harass me lmao, I actually had to put him on block list because he was just being annoying and obnoxious

Look at his post history, living in his head rent free that's for sure, thankfully I take that as a compliment if I rile up someone that much without even doing anything, but it gets boring after like the 5th post