Quote Originally Posted by Supersnow845 View Post
Has anyone here who doesn’t like current healing ever said that there should be no compromise and that all the healers need to be changed or are you just conflating totally different issues

For example let’s say we changed 3 healers and left 1 in its mostly current form, the two most likely candidates to be left alone are the regen healers, WHM is the games baby healer for better or for worse and AST while I think it’s clunky can be argued has a somewhat interesting DPS expression system

Now let’s say in thread 1 I say “yeah sure we can leave WHM mostly alone for people who like current healers” then in thread 2 I say “I think despite misery being a patchwork fix lilies just do not fix 14’s healing style” that is not me going back on my first point, that is me presenting my opinion on x job when the discussion focuses on y thing

I’ve never been opposed to jobs being left in their current form, hell current WHM is functionally 4.0 WHM anyway on a difficulty level, is anyone really asking for 4 HW SCH’s

So again I’ll say just because I rag on each healer individually when it comes up in conversation does not mean that I’m opposed to one or two staying roughly the same

Do I need to spell this out every time I have an opinion about a healer
To be fair, there has been far more discussion and arguments m some of which were made in favour of modifying all of the healers and not leaving one "as-is". I'm not going to even try to summarize all of the past threads and posts (of which there have been many), some of which ( I would say a minority) - but argued in favour of leaving one alone.

A caveat- those were lengthy discussions, that's what I recall. Incidentally I would not say that "AST has an interesting DPS expression system", I don't consider spamming malefic that interesting, and the card system is currently not well designed in some aspects.