That's literally what I have done.
You can disagree with someone's position, but it's not right to lie about what their position is or how they've defended it.
Anyway, yeah, I used to think it's always possible to have a rational discussion with anyone. That talking is good, finding compromise/meeting in the middle is good, and so on. These threads have me reevaluating that position. Not that you need listen, but in the future, if people give you a position based on insight, you contest it, and they defend their position with argument, you should listen to them. Strawmaning either their position or their argument style while suggesting the opposition (on your side) isn't that (Gaius' posts in here have been "well thought-out points that came from experience"? REALLY? You're going with calling digital heckling "well-thought out"?) is just outright lying.
It's also telling that the posts getting the most upvotes are those that are just plain and simple heckling, not actual arguments or proposals.
Let's take a look:
20 Likes
16 Likes (who also edited his post later after it got a bunch of those likes to include the other lines; and no, he won't post on his main or say who his main is to look up, and when I asked him, said he wouldn't tell me because it wouldn't make a difference - the exact opposite of his lying statement now:
Apparently, people like lies so much they'll upvote abject lies as long as they support said poster bashing/heckling someone else...)
19 Likes
.
Which of these posts was a "well thought-out argument based on experience that made sense"? Ty's was a continuation of his long-standing feud with me from the Healer forum where he misinterprets what I say, when I clarify insists his misinterpretation is even more right than me telling him outright what I meant, and will never admit he was wrong about it. Gaius' post is a "he's a child" insult, where he says "even if you show him all your accomplishments" (something he's refused to do even once), and he's well known on General Discussion here for being a troll with a thread he started having basically every poster who is a common poster here in General point out that he's a well known troll who loves to harass people and posts on various alt accounts (actual ACCOUNTS) because he doesn't want people knowing what he actually has done or not done. And Fable I've honestly not encountered much other than her complaining about post length in a DPS thread on SMN instead of reading or responding to the arguments in the posts.
If you're going to call those well thought-out and sensible posts and mine not...you might want to reconsider your analytical techniques...
That tells me the people posting/liking posts here don't want well thought-out points that come from experience and make sense - which, for the record, mine are and have been - they want heckling and jeering of people who are making well thought-out posts from experience that make sense but with which they disagree personally and so prefer the heckling to having to confront difficult arguments that contest their views.
The dirty secret is, if I clear every Savage and Ultimate in this game, you'd just find something else to attack me over because you don't want agreement, middle-ground, or compromise. That I haven't is just your low hanging fruit excuse not to listen.
Well, that's good at least.
As to your statement of my proposed solution:
My proposed solution is:
If you actually addressed what my stances are, not caricatures/strawmen of them, there might be a point in the discussion.
Many others besides me are saying these things, too.
And also:
Considering how you get likes for misrepresenting or misunderstanding my position, and Gauis gets likes for heckling, I would say that the like counter is, indeed, a completely useless metric, yes. Hundreds of people have posted in these threads and you get ~10 likes on things, with ~20 likes on outright heckle posts? Yeah, pretty sure that makes it a pretty terrible metric to use for anything meaningful. Maybe if the heckling posts weren't getting so highly rated, and maybe if the pro-heckle/jeer crowd wasn't overplaying their hands by liking rampant rule violation rude heckling posts, the metric would have more meaning.
But it doesn't because of that. Well, that and other reasons, besides.
.
Oh:
And bring back nAST.
I forgot to add that one above.
Says the stalker.
Nope. You can post on your main or you can't. You haven't, and even refused to. All you've done is troll, heckle, stalk, and harass people, and been rewarded for it by people who I guess don't know better or who support internet bullying and stalking. And I'm not going to devote posts to you further. Troll harder. Or better yet, stop trolling.
Going to put my replies to you in hb going forward to spare sane people of having to be exposed to your trollish jeering and heckling anymore than necessary.