No, you didn't.
This is the point you could say 'oh, my bad'. You didn't try to have a normal... /sigh
Whatever.
Ah, the casual who hasn't cleared PotD or BA or any raid is back to show us more how he doesn't know anything about the game. I'm still waiting for that marriage proposal, since you're stalking me so much.
Who are you?
I have more experience with the content than you do, apparently.
You're calling out people and acting like the law of the forums. ("the law of the forums"? What's that even mean?)
I'm expressing agreement with people when I agree with them. That's a crime? Are we NOT supposed to agree with people? "congratulating"? What? o.O
I have more experience with this topic than you do, it seems.
It's really interesting seeing a bunch of people posting on users that have no clear data insisting that only they get to talk about something that would affect the entire playerbase...
EDIT:
But, this also isn't relevant.
Let's try getting back to relevance, before we got on this weird...tangent:
[spacing added vs original]
Please do tell me what's wrong with this assessment, or what your contra assessment is. Or feel free to express agreement. /shrug
Last edited by Renathras; 05-20-2023 at 11:27 AM. Reason: Marked with EDIT
The assessment is fine, it identifies the problem. The issue everyone is taking is not with your problem finding skills, but with your proposed solution to the problem. It's akin to saying 'yeh we should have all the melee be of different simplicity levels so that everyone has a class they can enjoy', leading to one of the melee, probably SAM at this point, let's be real, being reduced in skill ceiling to just being 'build sen spend sen'. Kaiten gone, people couldn't remember to save 20 gauge for it. Senei gauge pooling gone, Ikishoten gives 50 and Senei costs 25, you're always going to have enough. At this rate, in 7.0 Higanbana will be gone, because people are bad at remembering to apply a dot once a minute.
And when someone on the forums says 'damn I miss when SAM had a skill ceiling and you had optimizations you could do on it' your response is that 'no it has to stay braindead because otherwise you alienate the people who like the braindead gameplay', it's a ridiculous stance to take and that's why you get called out on it so much
Also I know you don't like comparing post like counts, insisting they're not a valid way to measure sentiment, but they're all we have here. And I see a whole lot of 10+ arguing against you, and a whole lot of 1's and 2's for you. Probably just the 'echo chamber' at work again, right? Everyone's always against Ren what a cruel world
I'm not going to be wasting my time on you any further cause it just seems like every conversation we have just goes around in circles.
But you clearly have a very weird way of going about your arguments.
You present a solution to the problem, people disagree with you and they back their arguments up with well thought-out points that came from experience, and those points actually make sense.
And then you counter those arguments by going back to the "Oh! There's no problem at all! Everyone enjoys X the way it is! Therefore, my point is better!!"
It's boring to have a discussion like that. I suggest you go ahead and play other games so your perspective isn't just stuck in "FFXIV Healing".
Get some more insight and come back so we can actually have a fruitful discussion, rather than going around circles and wasting everyone else's time.
That's literally what I have done.
You can disagree with someone's position, but it's not right to lie about what their position is or how they've defended it.
Anyway, yeah, I used to think it's always possible to have a rational discussion with anyone. That talking is good, finding compromise/meeting in the middle is good, and so on. These threads have me reevaluating that position. Not that you need listen, but in the future, if people give you a position based on insight, you contest it, and they defend their position with argument, you should listen to them. Strawmaning either their position or their argument style while suggesting the opposition (on your side) isn't that (Gaius' posts in here have been "well thought-out points that came from experience"? REALLY? You're going with calling digital heckling "well-thought out"?) is just outright lying.
It's also telling that the posts getting the most upvotes are those that are just plain and simple heckling, not actual arguments or proposals.
Let's take a look:
20 Likes
16 Likes (who also edited his post later after it got a bunch of those likes to include the other lines; and no, he won't post on his main or say who his main is to look up, and when I asked him, said he wouldn't tell me because it wouldn't make a difference - the exact opposite of his lying statement now:
Apparently, people like lies so much they'll upvote abject lies as long as they support said poster bashing/heckling someone else...)
19 Likes
.
Which of these posts was a "well thought-out argument based on experience that made sense"? Ty's was a continuation of his long-standing feud with me from the Healer forum where he misinterprets what I say, when I clarify insists his misinterpretation is even more right than me telling him outright what I meant, and will never admit he was wrong about it. Gaius' post is a "he's a child" insult, where he says "even if you show him all your accomplishments" (something he's refused to do even once), and he's well known on General Discussion here for being a troll with a thread he started having basically every poster who is a common poster here in General point out that he's a well known troll who loves to harass people and posts on various alt accounts (actual ACCOUNTS) because he doesn't want people knowing what he actually has done or not done. And Fable I've honestly not encountered much other than her complaining about post length in a DPS thread on SMN instead of reading or responding to the arguments in the posts.
If you're going to call those well thought-out and sensible posts and mine not...you might want to reconsider your analytical techniques...
That tells me the people posting/liking posts here don't want well thought-out points that come from experience and make sense - which, for the record, mine are and have been - they want heckling and jeering of people who are making well thought-out posts from experience that make sense but with which they disagree personally and so prefer the heckling to having to confront difficult arguments that contest their views.
The dirty secret is, if I clear every Savage and Ultimate in this game, you'd just find something else to attack me over because you don't want agreement, middle-ground, or compromise. That I haven't is just your low hanging fruit excuse not to listen.
Well, that's good at least.
As to your statement of my proposed solution:
My proposed solution is:
If you actually addressed what my stances are, not caricatures/strawmen of them, there might be a point in the discussion.
Many others besides me are saying these things, too.
And also:
Considering how you get likes for misrepresenting or misunderstanding my position, and Gauis gets likes for heckling, I would say that the like counter is, indeed, a completely useless metric, yes. Hundreds of people have posted in these threads and you get ~10 likes on things, with ~20 likes on outright heckle posts? Yeah, pretty sure that makes it a pretty terrible metric to use for anything meaningful. Maybe if the heckling posts weren't getting so highly rated, and maybe if the pro-heckle/jeer crowd wasn't overplaying their hands by liking rampant rule violation rude heckling posts, the metric would have more meaning.
But it doesn't because of that. Well, that and other reasons, besides.
.
Oh:
And bring back nAST.
I forgot to add that one above.
Says the stalker.
Nope. You can post on your main or you can't. You haven't, and even refused to. All you've done is troll, heckle, stalk, and harass people, and been rewarded for it by people who I guess don't know better or who support internet bullying and stalking. And I'm not going to devote posts to you further. Troll harder. Or better yet, stop trolling.
Going to put my replies to you in hb going forward to spare sane people of having to be exposed to your trollish jeering and heckling anymore than necessary.
Last edited by Renathras; 05-21-2023 at 06:11 AM. Reason: EDIT for length
Last edited by GaiusDrakon; 05-21-2023 at 05:29 AM.
I'll take a Kenleebudouchu for 10 please Bob?
~ WHM / badSCH / Snob ~ http://eu.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/character/871132/ ~
Woa I have never seen such an adept forum baiter. What exactly do you bring to the table instead? I believe that it's possible to get new changes, and try to relate my ideas to what the devs seem to be leaning toward.
Also, Scholar does not have any trouble in spending AF. What troubles scholar the most is using faerie gage. So how about a ## gage cost ability instead of just Aetherpact for faerie gage? Instead of this constant copy paste back and forth bickering? What is up with the extreme contentiousness?I close my doors.
I just said I agree with someone on something, and you attack me for it?
God this place is weird...
The other user said Lustrate/Durochole, not me. I just agreed. Maybe attack them (or was it you that posted that?) I do agree Faerie Gauge is useless, though. My personal belief is that Energy Drain should draw from Faerie Gauge, OR Fey Blessing again, just without the CD (so you can choose to use Faerie Gauge on either a single target or an AOE heal, at your discretion). SCH having a pure barrier AF spender would be nice for a couple reasons as well. First, just in a lore sense - SCH is the OG Barrier Healer, as I pointed out, yet has the LEAST RESPONSIVE barriers of any Healer Job. WHM and AST have instant cast barriers (Benison and Intersection), and SCH has Haima, Panhaima, Holos, and the 1 sec instant cast on the move combination of Eukrasia and either Prognosis OR Diagnosis for single target OR AOE barrier options.
What does SCH have for barrier options? Adlo and Succor (2 sec casts, Succor also gets overwritten frequently by SGE because of the weird priority that Eukrasian shields have) and the summoning sickness Seraph shields. Why does the OG Barrier Healer have the least responsive shielding capability? That's just...conceptually odd.
Secondarily, it would give them an AF dump when Excogitation is on CD. Shielding almost never goes to waste on Tanks, and can often be useful on others if the shield buff is long enough (30 sec or so). While you CAN use Energy Drain for this right now, that's only if the boss is targetable. A shiled could be used anytime. And often, when the boss isn't targetable, it's because it's about to use some big attack, in which case being able to burn excess AFs on shields then as your Aetherflow comes off CD so you can use it without overcapping, would actually benefit the party.
So either way you slice it, it's not a bad idea to have.
But yeah, if you're going to attack someone for the idea, maybe you should attack...the person...who said this:
Oh, wait...that was you.
Why are you attacking your own idea now?
And why get 11 Likes for attacking...someone agreeing...with your own idea?
(Again proving Likes are the worst possible metric for judging ideas or support for anything other than cliques and vendettas - seriously, whoever is doing that, you're working against yourselves, lol)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|