Quote Originally Posted by Antoine_Lenheim View Post
Active FC which loses to a solo FC is the only way to make the lottery system FAIR. You're wrong if you think it should cater to the needs of the other party simply because it's bigger. If it does, it either needs to penalize them by having an established entry fee so if 56 man FC wants to bid with all their members, they need to pay that fee which will not be refunded even if they win the plot. Or they simply shouldn't allow multiple entrants from one FC.

You can't make everyone happy anyway so AT LEAST try and make the current system fair for every and each one of the entrants by giving them equal chances of getting the house.
I never understood why they never did the no refund if win method for FCs, it makes perfect sense and is the most fair method.
An FC with a large amount of active members determined to get a house will easily come up with the funds to dominate the bids but it will cost them to secure it, but at the same time it also allows a committed and active small FC to get a decent chance at winning vs a mostly inactive large FC.
it also moderately keeps house flippers and sub farmers away from larger houses due to lower return of investment.