Can we have an official response on the RMT sub FC farms?

[Seraphor]

When it's specifically allowed by the rules, as stated elsewhere on the page that you're not bothering to show, it is not going against the spirit of the rules. It stops being a loophole.

We can dislike it. We can say that it goes against what we think the spirit of the rules should be.

SE clearly disagrees else they wouldn't have added the additional language about how additional houses can be obtained.

What am I not bothering to show?
Do they have a diagram that says you are allowed to own multiple FC's per service account that I'm not seeing?

I thought I explained it quite clearly.
Something that goes against 'the spirit of the law', but not 'the letter of the law', is known as a loophole.
That's what this is.

If you define 'the spirit of the law' as what is allowed by the letter of the law, you have circular logic.

The fact that leaving an FC that you are the leader of somehow avoids this restriction is likely a workaround to prevent cases where people suddenly find themselves in charge of an FC they didn't mean to be, saddled with a house they didn't want to be responsible for, and yet unable to otherwise manage another existing FC house for which they were already in charge of. This is not a simple system, there's so many pitfalls when you have the ability to make multiple characters on multiple worlds each with their own limitations when it comes to housing.
I don't necessarily think there's anything they can do to fix it at this point, and they can't enforce this loophole without negatively impacting other players in these fringe cases, so it's all academic anyway.