Because, even if in far fewer cases than before, you can still die during living dead in single target situations by yourself. It was the same reason why people wanted stacks on blood weapon: You can miss that last GCD. Shields are not helping you remove that debuff in single-target, more healing is.
Healing through LD in mob packs is not an issue because you literally remove that debuff instantly in aoe.
You aren't using Souleater because it has passive sustain, you're using it because it's in your 1-2-3, that one Souleater you use during Living Dead isn't going to save you from dying if you miss that last GCD. That's why even having just one CD via any method that gives us self-healing would be of massive benefit. Because shields are effective hp, not healing. Dark Knight is by far the most defensive tank once it hits 70, which isn't much up for debate. It's just behind on some minor sustain it needs to be completely self-sufficient.
I don't even mind how DRK feels now when it comes to survivability, but I'm not going to pretend it isn't lacking in sustain. It doesn't even need to be anything huge.
I don't see them ever giving them 2 charges of TBN purely because of how powerful it would make it. It is good, but outshined by the other tanks cooldowns they received in endwalker, but would VASTLY outperform them if it had two stacks. Especially with how high our HP is going to end up next expansion, it would be essentially ShB TBN but even more cracked. Also no, having some minor sustain isn't necessarily going to make DRK immortal, TBN prevents incoming damage, but healing does not. If it were such an issue, they could just shift some mit around. (putting oblation on one use instead of 2 stacks, for example).
As a sidenote: When you mention TBN getting two stacks, I feel like that was the original plan for lvl 82, but they decided to make oblation instead, which is mostly paired with tbn anyway.



Reply With Quote


