

Honestly dont care about the turrets, never did, they were more interesting then AQ but that dont say much.And add onto it the years of devs ignoring the real issues with the job and playerbase, the fact that we have meh dps and a "simple" rotation while also having the second highest bpm. It's hard to love mch. Look at any thread on here or reddit that pertains to us and you can see tons of ways the job could be better it makes you wonder why the devs said "There's really no where to take mch." or something along those lines. Clearly there are problems, clearly there are tons of ways and ideas they could implement that would make the job better without it becoming "OP". Yet, its patch after patch and expansion after expansion where nothing really changes for an overall positive. They took away our turrets, took away what little utility we had and gave us a glorified dot that doesn't feel like your doing anything big. Every other job capstone abilities are exciting and feel like a big move for them. I mean even our LB3 is kinda meh comparative to the other jobs. Yeah its a big cool laser beam but look at Brds arrow storm and dnc fan dance dash, (i know those arent the names), they are big grand animations. Also how did we go from helicopter turrets, to a full on futuristic AQ for capstone and giant laser turret for LB. It just seems like we're missing a lot of technology between rook and AQ.
Honestly I’m on board for removing the battery gauge and putting AQ on a ogcd, give me bullets back bullets were fun.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

