Housing sucks rn!

[GeminiReed]

But I guess, apart from them not wanting too, what happens if everyone with an apartment switched to medium and jumped from 100 objects to 300 objects in terms of space and backup time? Still, it's not a unique problem, I've worked on mission critical systems with petabytes of data and we managed with zero downtime outside of major patches.

A bit of napkin math. Complete SWAG because I don't know how talented their data designers are or are not.

- placeable id: 4 bytes
- posittion (x,y,z): 6 bytes (3 half-floats)
- rotation: 2 bytes (another half-float)
- dye: 2 bytes (just in case)

14 bytes per object. At 200 extra objects that's an additional 280 bytes per interior. Assuming the 21,600 figure is correct for number of apartments per world the additional storage budget would be a whopping 6Mb per server.

*hands a quarter to Square* keep the change.

[Silverbane]

A bit of napkin math. Complete SWAG because I don't know how talented their data designers are or are not.

- placeable id: 4 bytes
- posittion (x,y,z): 6 bytes (3 half-floats)
- rotation: 2 bytes (another half-float)
- dye: 2 bytes (just in case)

14 bytes per object. At 200 extra objects that's an additional 2802800 bytes per interior. Assuming the 21,600 figure is correct for number of apartments per world the additional storage budget would be a whopping 6Mb60MB per server.

*hands a quarter to Square* keep the change.

I fixed some simple math errors in your post.