Quote Originally Posted by Alleo View Post
I wonder if you would still found it fair if you finally get a house and then lose it thanks to the timer?

How about instead of punishing players we make it fair in a way that EVERYONE gets a house. Instead of wanting that bandaid back that wont free many houses while also hurting someone that was not able to log in, we group together and demand SE to change that system? How about a round of instanced housing where you can decide which house size you want?

Instanced housing would be the best way for this game. Everyone gets a house, the rewards in events and quests dont feel like a punch for those that dont have one and maybe people would chill out more instead of trying to hurt others so that they can get their chance. (And still fail because there are simply too many people)

Days ago someone wrote in my house that he gives it a -2 in decoration and that he could do so much better with it. Sorry player, its not my fault that I have this house and you dont have one. Dont need to be rude for it.
You do realize, that it is kinda profitable for the system they have in place, for anyone with an attachment to their digital ingame house? You effectively cant quit. Your subscription is assured, if they can get you attached enough to having a ingame house that the idea of losing is kinda is in part warranting a continued subscription. That youll login just to maintain it, and since that requires a subscription...

Its kinda rude what he posted, maybe not out of jealousy though.